These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

387 related items for PubMed ID: 24177807

  • 21. Natural history of open-angle glaucoma.
    Heijl A, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Leske MC, Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Dec; 116(12):2271-6. PubMed ID: 19854514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Incidence and rates of visual field progression after longitudinally measured optic disc change in glaucoma.
    Chauhan BC, Nicolela MT, Artes PH.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Nov; 116(11):2110-8. PubMed ID: 19500850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
    Murata H, Tomidokoro A, Matsuo H, Tomita G, Araie M.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. What reduction in standard automated perimetry variability would improve the detection of visual field progression?
    Turpin A, McKendrick AM.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 May 17; 52(6):3237-45. PubMed ID: 21357405
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May 17; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis.
    Sakai T, Matsushima M, Shikishima K, Kitahara K.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May 17; 114(5):949-56. PubMed ID: 17382395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM, Kim LS, Pacey IE, Cunliffe IA.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb 17; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Semi-automated kinetic perimetry provides additional information to static automated perimetry in the assessment of the remaining visual field in end-stage glaucoma.
    Nowomiejska K, Wrobel-Dudzinska D, Ksiazek K, Ksiazek P, Rejdak K, Maciejewski R, Juenemann AG, Rejdak R.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Mar 17; 35(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 25444538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb 17; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C, Pascual J, Medeiros FA, Aihara M, Weinreb RN, Sample PA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul 17; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Statistical evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of methods used to determine the progression of visual field defects in glaucoma.
    Mayama C, Araie M, Suzuki Y, Ishida K, Yamamoto T, Kitazawa Y, Shirakashi M, Abe H, Tsukamoto H, Mishima HK, Yoshimura K, Ohashi Y.
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov 17; 111(11):2117-25. PubMed ID: 15522380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry and Changes in Quality of Life of Glaucoma Patients: A Longitudinal Study.
    Abe RY, Gracitelli CP, Diniz-Filho A, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Medeiros FA.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jul 17; 160(1):114-122.e1. PubMed ID: 25868760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma.
    Smith SD, Katz J, Quigley HA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jun 17; 37(7):1419-28. PubMed ID: 8641844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
    Spry PG, Johnson CA, McKendrick AM, Turpin A.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 May 17; 42(6):1404-10. PubMed ID: 11328758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Influence of visual field testing frequency on detection of glaucoma progression with trend analyses.
    Nouri-Mahdavi K, Zarei R, Caprioli J.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2011 Dec 17; 129(12):1521-7. PubMed ID: 21825177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Discriminating ability of Humphrey matrix perimetry in early glaucoma patients.
    Hong S, Chung W, Hong YJ, Seong GJ.
    Ophthalmologica; 2007 Dec 17; 221(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 17440283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.