These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

110 related items for PubMed ID: 24188339

  • 1. Improved detection of semen by use of direct acid phosphatase testing.
    Lewis J, Baird A, McAlister C, Siemieniuk A, Blackmore L, McCabe B, O'Rourke P, Parekh R, Watson E, Wheelhouse M, Wilson N.
    Sci Justice; 2013 Dec; 53(4):385-94. PubMed ID: 24188339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The fallacy of the two-minute acid phosphatase cut off.
    Lewis J, Jones S, Baxter F, Siemieniuk A, Talbot R.
    Sci Justice; 2012 Jun; 52(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 22583498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Acid phosphatase screening - wetting test paper or wetting fabric and test paper?
    Davidson G, Jalowiecki TB.
    Sci Justice; 2012 Jun; 52(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 22583503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The acid phosphatase test two minute cut-off: an insufficient time to detect some semen stains.
    Redhead P, Brown MK.
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 23601727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The use of acid phosphatase test papers for DNA profiling.
    Reshef A, Barash M, Gallili N, Michael A, Brauner P.
    Sci Justice; 2005 Jun; 45(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 16080323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Optimisation of choline testing using Florence Iodine reagent, including comparative sensitivity and specificity with PSA and AP tests.
    Hardinge P, Allard J, Wain A, Watson S.
    Sci Justice; 2013 Mar; 53(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 23380060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison between prostate specific antigen and acid phosphatase for detection of semen in vaginal swabs from raped women.
    Peonim V, Worasuwannarak W, Sujirachato K, Teerakamchai S, Srisont S, Udnoon J, Chudoung U.
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Aug; 20(6):578-81. PubMed ID: 23910836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The use of Polilight in the detection of seminal fluid, saliva, and bloodstains and comparison with conventional chemical-based screening tests.
    Vandenberg N, van Oorschot RA.
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Mar; 51(2):361-70. PubMed ID: 16566772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Acid phosphatase test on Phadebas® sheets - An optimized method for presumptive saliva and semen detection.
    Herman Y, Feine I, Gafny R.
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():218-222. PubMed ID: 29775922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Follow-up on the Berg acid phosphatase test.
    Schiff AF.
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 1998 Mar; 19(1):67-8. PubMed ID: 9539395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The simultaneous identification of seminal acid phosphatase and phosphoglucomutase by starch gel electrophoresis.
    Linde HG, Molnar KE.
    J Forensic Sci; 1980 Jan; 25(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 6446593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Presumptive screening test for seminal acid phosphatase using sodium thymolphthalein monophosphate.
    Seiden H, Duncan GT.
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1983 Jan; 66(1):207-9. PubMed ID: 6826509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Relationship of spermatoscopy, prostatic acid phosphatase activity and prostate-specific antigen (p30) assays with further DNA typing in forensic samples from rape cases.
    Romero-Montoya L, Martínez-Rodríguez H, Pérez MA, Argüello-García R.
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Mar 20; 206(1-3):111-8. PubMed ID: 20692115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Sensitivity and specificity of presumptive tests for blood, saliva and semen.
    Vennemann M, Scott G, Curran L, Bittner F, Tobe SS.
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2014 Mar 20; 10(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 24443142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of three rapid detection methods for the forensic identification of seminal fluid in rape cases.
    Khaldi N, Miras A, Botti K, Benali L, Gromb S.
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jul 20; 49(4):749-53. PubMed ID: 15317189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Development of biological standards for the quality assurance of presumptive testing reagents.
    Laux DL.
    Sci Justice; 2011 Sep 20; 51(3):143-5. PubMed ID: 21889112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Acid phosphatase in seminal fluid--method of estimation and diagnostic significance].
    Heite HJ, Wetterauer W.
    Andrologia; 1979 Sep 20; 11(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 36009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of the modified zinc test and the acid phosphatase test as preliminary screening methods in sexual assault case material.
    Hooft P, van de Voorde H.
    Forensic Sci Int; 1992 Mar 20; 53(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 1592323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Presumptive screening of suspected semen stain in situ using cotton swabs and bromochloroindolyl phosphate to detect prostatic acid phosphatase activity.
    Baechtel FS, Brown J, Terrell LD.
    J Forensic Sci; 1987 Jul 20; 32(4):880-7. PubMed ID: 3612073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. An evaluation of an enzymatic choline determination for the identification of semen in casework samples.
    Noppinger K, Morrison R, Jones NH, Hopkins H.
    J Forensic Sci; 1987 Jul 20; 32(4):1069-74. PubMed ID: 3612062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.