These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

132 related items for PubMed ID: 24190829

  • 1. [Assessment of mesopic and contrast vision for driving licences: which cut-off values, which methods are appropriate?].
    Wilhelm H, Peters T, Durst W, Roelcke S, Quast R, Hütten M, Wilhelm B.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2013 Nov; 230(11):1106-13. PubMed ID: 24190829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Measurement of contrast vision: mesopic or photopic vision? : Comparison of different methods for measuring contrast sensitivity within the framework of driving licence regulations].
    Bergmann LC, Darius S, Kropf S, Böckelmann I.
    Ophthalmologe; 2016 Oct; 113(10):844-851. PubMed ID: 27142036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.
    Thayaparan K, Crossland MD, Rubin GS.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 91(6):749-52. PubMed ID: 17166891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Mesopic Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity and MP-1 microperimetry in healthy ageing and age-related macular degeneration.
    Maynard ML, Zele AJ, Feigl B.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 94(8):e772-e778. PubMed ID: 27225020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Experience in contrast vision testing].
    Wilhelm H, Hofmann D, Roelcke S, Quast R.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2011 Nov; 228(11):967-70. PubMed ID: 22072489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The letter contrast sensitivity test: clinical evaluation of a new design.
    Haymes SA, Roberts KF, Cruess AF, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Ramsey MS, Chauhan BC, Artes PH.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 47(6):2739-45. PubMed ID: 16723494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. An evaluation of the Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test.
    Dougherty BE, Flom RE, Bullimore MA.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):970-5. PubMed ID: 16317373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Marked dissociation of photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity even in normal observers.
    Hertenstein H, Bach M, Gross NJ, Beisse F.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 254(2):373-84. PubMed ID: 25921390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Test-retest Repeatability of the Ohio Contrast Cards.
    Osman M, Njeru SM, Hopkins GR, Brown AM.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Sep 01; 98(9):1070-1077. PubMed ID: 34570031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Value of Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart for evaluation of visual system in multiple sclerosis patients.
    Wender M.
    Neurol Neurochir Pol; 2007 Sep 01; 41(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 17530576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Multicentric study regarding assessment of the driving ability of LASIK and orthokeratology patients compared with conventionally corrected persons].
    Uthoff D, Hebestedt K, Duncker G, Sickenberger H.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2013 Mar 01; 230(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 23508754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.