These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
304 related items for PubMed ID: 24200480
21. Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with Ki-67 proliferation index in grading meningioma. Tang Y, Dundamadappa SK, Thangasamy S, Flood T, Moser R, Smith T, Cauley K, Takhtani D. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jun; 202(6):1303-8. PubMed ID: 24848829 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical applications of diffusion-weighted-MRI in prostate cancer. Wibulpolprasert P, Phongkitkarun S, Chalermsanyakorn P. J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Aug; 96(8):967-75. PubMed ID: 23991605 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Apparent diffusion coefficient value reflects invasive and proliferative potential of bladder cancer. Kobayashi S, Koga F, Kajino K, Yoshita S, Ishii C, Tanaka H, Saito K, Masuda H, Fujii Y, Yamada T, Kihara K. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jan; 39(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 23589321 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Lymphomas and glioblastomas: differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient evaluated with high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. Doskaliyev A, Yamasaki F, Ohtaki M, Kajiwara Y, Takeshima Y, Watanabe Y, Takayasu T, Amatya VJ, Akiyama Y, Sugiyama K, Kurisu K. Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 21129872 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. High-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T to detect prostate cancer: comparisons between b values of 1,000 and 2,000 s/mm2. Kim CK, Park BK, Kim B. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):W33-7. PubMed ID: 20028888 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer using a statistical model based on the gamma distribution. Shinmoto H, Oshio K, Tamura C, Soga S, Okamura T, Yamada K, Kaji T, Mulkern RV. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jul; 42(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 25223894 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Early changes in apparent diffusion coefficient from diffusion-weighted MR imaging during radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Park SY, Kim CK, Park BK, Park W, Park HC, Han DH, Kim B. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jun 01; 83(2):749-55. PubMed ID: 22154286 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Detection of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance imaging: optimization of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, dynamic-enhanced T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient mapping sequences and MR spectroscopy, correlated with biopsy and histopathological findings. Aydin H, Kizilgöz V, Tatar IG, Damar C, Ugan AR, Paker I, Hekimoğlu B. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012 Jun 01; 36(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 22261768 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values obtained using high b-value when diagnosing prostate cancer using 3 tesla MRI: comparison between ultra-high b-value (2000 s/mm²) and standard high b-value (1000 s/mm²). Kitajima K, Takahashi S, Ueno Y, Yoshikawa T, Ohno Y, Obara M, Miyake H, Fujisawa M, Sugimura K. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jul 01; 36(1):198-205. PubMed ID: 22371381 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosis of urinary bladder invasion in patients with prostate carcinoma. Ren J, Huan Y, Li F, Wang H, Ge Y, Chang Y, Yin H, Sun L. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Aug 01; 30(2):351-6. PubMed ID: 19591203 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer. Rosenkrantz AB, Sigmund EE, Johnson G, Babb JS, Mussi TC, Melamed J, Taneja SS, Lee VS, Jensen JH. Radiology; 2012 Jul 01; 264(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 22550312 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Non-invasive estimation of prostate cancer aggressiveness using diffusion-weighted MRI and 3D proton MR spectroscopy at 3.0 T. Thörmer G, Otto J, Horn LC, Garnov N, Do M, Franz T, Stolzenburg JU, Moche M, Kahn T, Busse H. Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan 01; 56(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 24504488 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Prostate cancer vs. post-biopsy hemorrhage: diagnosis with T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging. Rosenkrantz AB, Kopec M, Kong X, Melamed J, Dakwar G, Babb JS, Taouli B. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun 01; 31(6):1387-94. PubMed ID: 20512891 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Diffusion-tensor MRI at 3 T: differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia. Park SY, Kim CK, Park BK, Ha SY, Kwon GY, Kim B. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar 01; 202(3):W254-62. PubMed ID: 24555622 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer. Hambrock T, Somford DM, Huisman HJ, van Oort IM, Witjes JA, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Scheenen T, Barentsz JO. Radiology; 2011 May 01; 259(2):453-61. PubMed ID: 21502392 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of stretched-Exponential and monoexponential model diffusion-Weighted imaging in prostate cancer and normal tissues. Liu X, Zhou L, Peng W, Wang H, Zhang Y. J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Oct 01; 42(4):1078-85. PubMed ID: 25727776 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Diffusion weighted imaging: its diagnostic and differential value for prostate cancer]. Shi H, Ding HY. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2007 Jul 01; 13(7):605-9. PubMed ID: 17725302 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Urinary bladder cancer: diffusion-weighted MR imaging--accuracy for diagnosing T stage and estimating histologic grade. Takeuchi M, Sasaki S, Ito M, Okada S, Takahashi S, Kawai T, Suzuki K, Oshima H, Hara M, Shibamoto Y. Radiology; 2009 Apr 01; 251(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 19332849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate at 3.0 T: comparison of endorectal coil (ERC) MRI and phased-array coil (PAC) MRI-The impact of SNR on ADC measurement. Mazaheri Y, Vargas HA, Nyman G, Shukla-Dave A, Akin O, Hricak H. Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct 01; 82(10):e515-20. PubMed ID: 23810189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]