These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

374 related items for PubMed ID: 24216383

  • 1. Novel sounds as a psychophysiological measure of listening effort in older listeners with and without hearing loss.
    Bertoli S, Bodmer D.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 May; 125(5):1030-41. PubMed ID: 24216383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of age and task difficulty on ERP responses to novel sounds presented during a speech-perception-in-noise test.
    Bertoli S, Bodmer D.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):360-368. PubMed ID: 25840528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Oates PA, Kurtzberg D, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):399-415. PubMed ID: 12411773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Wilson RH, Macdonald EN.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Oct; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Behavioral Measures of Listening Effort in School-Age Children: Examining the Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Hearing Loss, and Amplification.
    McGarrigle R, Gustafson SJ, Hornsby BWY, Bess FH.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Oct; 40(2):381-392. PubMed ID: 29905670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech.
    Martin BA, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):195-213. PubMed ID: 15809545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM, Ricketts TA, Hornsby BW.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM, Ricketts TA.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Sep; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA, Kurtzberg D, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
    Picou EM, Ricketts TA.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.
    Smith SL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Alexander G.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Dec; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Cortical Correlates of Binaural Temporal Processing Deficits in Older Adults.
    Eddins AC, Eddins DA.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Dec; 39(3):594-604. PubMed ID: 29135686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Measuring listening effort: driving simulator versus simple dual-task paradigm.
    Wu YH, Aksan N, Rizzo M, Stangl E, Zhang X, Bentler R.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Dec; 35(6):623-32. PubMed ID: 25083599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Verbal Response Times as a Potential Indicator of Cognitive Load During Conventional Speech Audiometry With Matrix Sentences.
    Meister H, Rählmann S, Lemke U, Besser J.
    Trends Hear; 2018 Dec; 22():2331216518793255. PubMed ID: 30124111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Speech-in-noise representation in the aging midbrain and cortex: Effects of hearing loss.
    Presacco A, Simon JZ, Anderson S.
    PLoS One; 2019 Dec; 14(3):e0213899. PubMed ID: 30865718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.