These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
748 related items for PubMed ID: 24269833
1. The timing of significant arch dimensional changes with fixed orthodontic appliances: data from a multicenter randomised controlled trial. Fleming PS, Lee RT, Mcdonald T, Pandis N, Johal A. J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24269833 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of maxillary arch dimensional changes with passive and active self-ligation and conventional brackets in the permanent dentition: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Fleming PS, Lee RT, Marinho V, Johal A. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 23910199 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances. Fleming PS, DiBiase AT, Sarri G, Lee RT. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19732667 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Makou M, Eliades T. Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Songra G, Clover M, Atack NE, Ewings P, Sherriff M, Sandy JR, Ireland AJ. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 24785921 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Finishing effectiveness of different archwires using SmartClip™ self-ligating brackets: a clinical study. Ferrari S, Bellincampi M, Sfondrini MF, Caprioglio A, Gandini P. Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 24456630 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of wire size on maxillary arch force/couple systems for a simulated high canine malocclusion. Major PW, Toogood RW, Badawi HM, Carey JP, Seru S. J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 24852959 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of transverse dimensional and incisor changes between wide and narrow orthodontic archwires: a randomized controlled trial. Ahmed AS, Al-Nimri KS, Ahmed WS. Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May 27; 28(6):338. PubMed ID: 38797781 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Maxillary dental arch changes following the leveling and alignment stage with lingual and labial orthodontic appliances: a preliminary report of a randomized controlled trial. Khattab TZ, Hajeer MY, Farah H, Al-Sabbagh R. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Sep 01; 15(5):561-6. PubMed ID: 25707826 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion. Wortham JR, Dolce C, McGorray SP, Le H, King GJ, Wheeler TT. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul 01; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandibular dental arch changes with active self-ligating brackets combined with different archwires. Atik E, Akarsu-Guven B, Kocadereli I. Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 May 01; 21(5):566-572. PubMed ID: 29735855 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial. Sharma M, Sharma V, Khanna B. J Orthod; 2012 Jun 01; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Geometric morphometric evaluations of a randomized prospective split-mouth study on modes of ligation and reverse-curve mechanics. Celar AG, Onodera K, Bertl MH, Astl E, Bantleon HP, Sato S, Mitteroecker P. Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Aug 01; 17(3):158-69. PubMed ID: 24720396 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional analysis of the tooth movement and arch dimension changes in Class I malocclusions treated with first premolar extractions: a guideline for virtual treatment planning. Cho MY, Choi JH, Lee SP, Baek SH. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec 01; 138(6):747-57. PubMed ID: 21130334 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models. Cattaneo PM, Treccani M, Carlsson K, Thorgeirsson T, Myrda A, Cevidanes LH, Melsen B. Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov 01; 14(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 22008302 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of self- and conventional-ligating brackets in the alignment stage. Wahab RM, Idris H, Yacob H, Ariffin SH. Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr 01; 34(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 21478298 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The clinical and laboratory effects of bracket type during canine distalization with sliding mechanics. Oz AA, Arici N, Arici S. Angle Orthod; 2012 Mar 01; 82(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 21875316 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Maxillary arch width changes during orthodontic treatment with fixed self-ligating and traditional straight-wire appliances. Tecco S, Tetè S, Perillo L, Chimenti C, Festa F. World J Orthod; 2009 Mar 01; 10(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 20072744 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state. Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Sep 01; 122(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 12226612 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Forces released by nonconventional bracket or ligature systems during alignment of buccally displaced teeth. Franchi L, Baccetti T, Camporesi M, Giuntini V. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep 01; 136(3):316.e1-6; discussion 316-7. PubMed ID: 19732660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]