These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

167 related items for PubMed ID: 24274914

  • 1. Examining the scope of questionable diagnostic reliability in Sexually Violent Predator (SVP) evaluations.
    Perillo AD, Spada AH, Calkins C, Jeglic EL.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 24274914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Use of DSM paraphilia diagnoses in sexually violent predator commitment cases.
    First MB, Halon RL.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 19092060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A practical guide for the evaluation of sexual recidivism risk in mentally retarded sex offenders.
    Phenix A, Sreenivasan S.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):509-24. PubMed ID: 20018999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Mental disorder, predisposition, prediction, and ability to control: evaluating sex offenders for civil commitment.
    Elwood RW.
    Sex Abuse; 2009 Dec; 21(4):395-411. PubMed ID: 19901235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Loathing the sinner, medicalizing the sin: why sexually violent predator statutes are unjust.
    Douard J.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007 Dec; 30(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 17157910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Hebephilia: quintessence of diagnostic pretextuality.
    Franklin K.
    Behav Sci Law; 2010 Dec; 28(6):751-68. PubMed ID: 21110392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Hebephilia and the construction of a fictitious diagnosis.
    Good P, Burstein J.
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2012 Jun; 200(6):492-4. PubMed ID: 22652613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The role and reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in U.S. sexually violent predator evaluations: a case law survey.
    DeMatteo D, Edens JF, Galloway M, Cox J, Smith ST, Formon D.
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Jun; 38(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24127888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The biasing effect of the "sexually violent predator" label on legal decisions.
    Scurich N, Gongola J, Krauss DA.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016 Jun; 47():109-14. PubMed ID: 27206709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. DSM-5 proposed diagnostic criteria for sexual paraphilias: tensions between diagnostic validity and forensic utility.
    Wakefield JC.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011 Jun; 34(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 21531463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Scholarly, clinical, and legal questions concerning hebephilia, with particular reference to sexually violent predator civil commitment proceedings.
    Blanchard R.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012 Jun; 40(1):157-8; author reply 158. PubMed ID: 22396353
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: a survey of experts.
    Jackson RL, Hess DT.
    Sex Abuse; 2007 Dec; 19(4):425-48. PubMed ID: 18000756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.