These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

289 related items for PubMed ID: 24276950

  • 1. Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous subclavian vein puncture versus surgical venous cutdown for the insertion of a totally implantable venous access device.
    Orci LA, Meier RP, Morel P, Staszewicz W, Toso C.
    Br J Surg; 2014 Jan; 101(2):8-16. PubMed ID: 24276950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A Prospective, Comparative Evaluation on Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices by External Jugular Vein versus Cephalic Vein Cutdown.
    Iorio O, Gazzanelli S, D'Ermo G, Pezzolla A, Gurrado A, Testini M, De Toma G, Cavallaro G.
    Am Surg; 2018 Jun 01; 84(6):841-843. PubMed ID: 29981612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Ultrasound-based prediction of cephalic vein cutdown success prior to totally implantable venous access device placement.
    Staszewicz W, Naiken SP, Mennet A, Meyer J, Righini M, Morel P, Toso C.
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2019 Nov 01; 7(6):865-869.e1. PubMed ID: 31495770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Percutaneous versus Cut-Down Technique for Indwelling Port Placement.
    Matiotti-Neto M, Eskander MF, Tabatabaie O, Kasumova G, Bliss LA, Ng SC, Tawa NE, Murphy B, Critchlow JF, Tseng JF.
    Am Surg; 2017 Dec 01; 83(12):1336-1342. PubMed ID: 29336750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Prospective randomised study of cephalic vein cut-down versus subclavian vein puncture. Technique in the implantation of subcutaneous venous access devices.
    D'Angelo FA.
    Chir Ital; 2003 Dec 01; 55(2):313. PubMed ID: 12744114
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Venous access and long-term pacemaker lead failure: comparing contrast-guided axillary vein puncture with subclavian puncture and cephalic cutdown.
    Chan NY, Kwong NP, Cheong AP.
    Europace; 2017 Jul 01; 19(7):1193-1197. PubMed ID: 27733455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Experience of anesthesiologists with percutaneous nonangiographic venous access.
    Chen PT, Sung CS, Wang CC, Chan KH, Chang WK, Hsu WH.
    J Clin Anesth; 2007 Dec 01; 19(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 18083475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Totally implantable venous access devices implanted surgically: a retrospective study on early and late complications.
    Di Carlo I, Cordio S, La Greca G, Privitera G, Russello D, Puleo S, Latteri F.
    Arch Surg; 2001 Sep 01; 136(9):1050-3. PubMed ID: 11529829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Randomized clinical trial comparing venous cutdown with the Seldinger technique for placement of implantable venous access ports.
    Nocito A, Wildi S, Rufibach K, Clavien PA, Weber M.
    Br J Surg; 2009 Oct 01; 96(10):1129-34. PubMed ID: 19731229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cephalic vein cutdown for inserting indwelling subclavian vein catheters in gynecologic oncology patients.
    Kamat A, Kramer P, Soisson AP.
    W V Med J; 2002 Oct 01; 98(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 11941896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement.
    Di Carlo I, Barbagallo F, Toro A, Sofia M, Lombardo R, Cordio S.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul 01; 12(7):570-3. PubMed ID: 15889215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Modification of approach for totally implantable venous access device decreases rate of complications.
    Karanlik H, Kurul S.
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Sep 01; 100(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 19582820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Routine chest X-ray is not mandatory after fluoroscopy-guided totally implantable venous access device insertion.
    Thomopoulos T, Meyer J, Staszewicz W, Bagetakos I, Scheffler M, Lomessy A, Toso C, Becker CD, Morel P.
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2014 Feb 01; 28(2):345-50. PubMed ID: 24360633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Ultrasound-assisted percutaneous catheterization of the axillary vein for totally implantable venous access device.
    Lin CP, Wang YC, Lin FS, Huang CH, Sun WZ.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 May 01; 37(5):448-51. PubMed ID: 21345637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Insertion of prolonged venous access device: a comparison between surgical cutdown and percutaneous techniques.
    Sarzo G, Finco C, Parise P, Savastano S, Vecchiato M, Degregori S, Merigliano S.
    Chir Ital; 2004 May 01; 56(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 15287644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cutdowns for totally implantable access ports to central veins.
    Kulaylat M, Karakousis CP.
    Vascular; 2009 May 01; 17(5):273-6. PubMed ID: 19769807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Guidewire assisted cephalic vein cutdown for insertion of totally implantable access ports.
    Chang HM, Hsieh HF, Hsu SD, Liao GS, Lin CH, Hsieh CB, Yu JC.
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb 01; 95(2):156-7. PubMed ID: 17262733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.