These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

512 related items for PubMed ID: 24286915

  • 1. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.
    Akyalcin S, Cozad BE, English JD, Colville CD, Laman S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accuracy of 3-dimensional curvilinear measurements on digital models with intraoral scanners.
    Mack S, Bonilla T, English JD, Cozad B, Akyalcin S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):420-425. PubMed ID: 28863923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis.
    Akyalcin S, Dyer DJ, English JD, Sar C.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):831-7. PubMed ID: 24286906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.
    White AJ, Fallis DW, Vandewalle KS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.
    Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts.
    de Waard O, Rangel FA, Fudalej PS, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Breuning KH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25172255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Lin HH, Chiang WC, Lo LJ, Sheng-Pin Hsu S, Wang CH, Wan SY.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
    Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG.
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
    Wiranto MG, Engelbrecht WP, Tutein Nolthenius HE, van der Meer WJ, Ren Y.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
    Timock AM, Cook V, McDonald T, Leo MC, Crowe J, Benninger BL, Covell DA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Influence of cone-beam computed tomography image artifacts on the determination of dental arch measurements.
    Gamba TO, Oliveira ML, Flores IL, Cruz AD, Almeida SM, Haiter-Neto F, Lopes SL.
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):274-8. PubMed ID: 23924404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Measurements of mandibular canal region obtained by cone-beam computed tomography: a cadaveric study.
    Kamburoğlu K, Kiliç C, Ozen T, Yüksel SP.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):e34-42. PubMed ID: 19138636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluating craniofacial asymmetry with digital cephalometric images and cone-beam computed tomography.
    de Moraes ME, Hollender LG, Chen CS, Moraes LC, Balducci I.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e523-31. PubMed ID: 21640864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models.
    El-Zanaty HM, El-Beialy AR, Abou El-Ezz AM, Attia KH, El-Bialy AR, Mostafa YA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20152684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.