These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

124 related items for PubMed ID: 24317212

  • 1. Silicone-coated thin film array cochlear implantation in a feline model.
    Van Beek-King JM, Bhatti PT, Blake D, Crawford J, McKinnon BJ.
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jan; 35(1):e45-9. PubMed ID: 24317212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE, Snyder RL, Schreiner CE, Raggio MW, Leake PA.
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J, Shepherd RK, Millard RE, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cochlear nerve stimulation with a 3-dimensional penetrating electrode array.
    Hillman T, Badi AN, Normann RA, Kertesz T, Shelton C.
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Sep; 24(5):764-8. PubMed ID: 14501454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants.
    Gordin A, Papsin B, Gordon K.
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.
    Snyder RL, Middlebrooks JC, Bonham BH.
    Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):23-38. PubMed ID: 18037252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Development of a novel eighth-nerve intraneural auditory neuroprosthesis.
    Badi AN, Kertesz TR, Gurgel RK, Shelton C, Normann RA.
    Laryngoscope; 2003 May; 113(5):833-42. PubMed ID: 12792319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Characteristics of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in patients with cochlear nerve canal stenosis receiving cochlear implants.
    Wang Z, Liu Y, Wang L, Shen X, Han S, Wang W, Gao F, Liang W, Peng KA.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jan; 104():98-103. PubMed ID: 29287891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Midbrain responses to micro-stimulation of the cochlea using high density thin-film arrays.
    Allitt BJ, Morgan SJ, Bell S, Nayagam DA, Arhatari B, Clark GM, Paolini AG.
    Hear Res; 2012 May; 287(1-2):30-42. PubMed ID: 22531007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. An improved cochlear implant electrode array for use in experimental studies.
    Shepherd R, Verhoeven K, Xu J, Risi F, Fallon J, Wise A.
    Hear Res; 2011 Jul; 277(1-2):20-7. PubMed ID: 21540098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The nucleus contour electrode array: an electrophysiological study.
    Pasanisi E, Vincenti V, Bacciu A, Guida M, Bacciu S.
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Sep; 112(9):1653-6. PubMed ID: 12352681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Preservation of auditory brainstem response thresholds after cochleostomy and titanium microactuator implantation in the lateral wall of cat scala tympani.
    Lesinski SG, Prewitt J, Bray V, Aravamudhan R, Bermeo Blanco OA, Farmer-Fedor BL, Ward JA.
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Apr; 35(4):730-8. PubMed ID: 24622027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.
    Shepherd RK, Hatsushika S, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1993 Mar; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8473242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Highly Flexible Silicone Coated Neural Array for Intracochlear Electrical Stimulation.
    Bhatti P, Van Beek-King J, Sharpe A, Crawford J, Tridandapani S, McKinnon B, Blake D.
    Biomed Res Int; 2015 Mar; 2015():109702. PubMed ID: 26236714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Development of an electrode for the artificial cochlear sensory epithelium.
    Tona Y, Inaoka T, Ito J, Kawano S, Nakagawa T.
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):106-12. PubMed ID: 26299844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
    Firszt JB, Chambers RD, Kraus And N, Reeder RM.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.
    Wilk M, Hessler R, Mugridge K, Jolly C, Fehr M, Lenarz T, Scheper V.
    PLoS One; 2016 Dec; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Design and fabrication of multichannel cochlear implants for animal research.
    Rebscher SJ, Hetherington AM, Snyder RL, Leake PA, Bonham BH.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct 15; 166(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 17727956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A silastic positioner for a modiolus-hugging position of intracochlear electrodes: electrophysiologic effects.
    Cords SM, Reuter G, Issing PR, Sommer A, Kuzma J, Lenarz T.
    Am J Otol; 2000 Mar 15; 21(2):212-7. PubMed ID: 10733186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.