These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

124 related items for PubMed ID: 24317212

  • 21. Usefulness of Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses to Assess the Functionality of the Cochlear Nerve Using an Intracochlear Test Electrode.
    Lassaletta L, Polak M, Huesers J, Díaz-Gómez M, Calvino M, Varela-Nieto I, Gavilán J.
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e413-e420. PubMed ID: 29076926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve using high surface area (HiQ) platinum electrodes.
    Tykocinski M, Duan Y, Tabor B, Cowan RS.
    Hear Res; 2001 Sep; 159(1-2):53-68. PubMed ID: 11520634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Comparison of electrically evoked whole-nerve action potential and electrically evoked auditory brainstem response thresholds in nucleus CI24R cochlear implant recipients.
    Hay-McCutcheon MJ, Brown CJ, Clay KS, Seyle K.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2002 Sep; 13(8):416-27. PubMed ID: 12371659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
    Bierer JA, Faulkner KF, Tremblay KL.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Sep; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Deafened kittens.
    Shepherd RK, Matsushima J, Martin RL, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):150-66. PubMed ID: 7737922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Histological and physiological effects of the central auditory prosthesis: surface versus penetrating electrodes.
    Liu X, McPhee G, Seldon HL, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 114(1-2):264-74. PubMed ID: 9447940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Auditory prosthesis with a penetrating nerve array.
    Middlebrooks JC, Snyder RL.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 8(2):258-79. PubMed ID: 17265124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Cochlear Implant Electrode Array From Partial to Full Insertion in Non-Human Primate Model.
    Manrique-Huarte R, Calavia D, Gallego MA, Manrique M.
    J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Apr; 14(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 29764773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. [Determinants of the effectiveness of electric stimulation of the auditory nerve with cochlear implants: II. Configuration of the stimulating electrodes].
    Kral A, Hartmann R, Klinke R.
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2000 Apr; 101(3):170-2. PubMed ID: 10870263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of a Parylene Thin-Film Electrode Array for Cochlear Implants.
    Xu Y, Luo C, Zeng FG, Middlebrooks JC, Lin HW, You Z.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2019 Feb; 66(2):573-583. PubMed ID: 30004866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. From nucleus 24 to 513: changing cochlear implant design affects auditory response thresholds.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC.
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 23370566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. EABR measurements during cochlear implantation in one-year-old, infant, child, adult, and elderly patients.
    Enomoto C, Minami S, Kaga K.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2021 Jan; 141(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 33146057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Fabrication and evaluation of an improved polymer-based cochlear electrode array for atraumatic insertion.
    Gwon TM, Min KS, Kim JH, Oh SH, Lee HS, Park MH, Kim SJ.
    Biomed Microdevices; 2015 Apr; 17(2):32. PubMed ID: 25681972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Effects of Implantation and Reimplantation of Cochlear Implant Electrodes in an In Vivo Animal Experimental Model (Macaca fascicularis).
    de Abajo J, Manrique-Huarte R, Sanhueza I, Alvarez-Gómez L, Zulueta-Santos C, Calavia D, Ramírez F, Manrique M.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Apr; 38(1):e57-e68. PubMed ID: 27556522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Direct Intracochlear Acoustic Stimulation Using a PZT Microactuator.
    Luo C, Omelchenko I, Manson R, Robbins C, Oesterle EC, Cao GZ, Shen IY, Hume CR.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec 01; 19():. PubMed ID: 26631107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants: a preclinical safety study.
    Shepherd RK, Wise AK, Enke YL, Carter PM, Fallon JB.
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Aug 01; 14(4):046020. PubMed ID: 28607224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Safety, reliability, and operability of cochlear implant electrode arrays coated with biocompatible polymer.
    Kinoshita M, Kikkawa YS, Sakamoto T, Kondo K, Ishihara K, Konno T, Pawsey N, Yamasoba T.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015 Apr 01; 135(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 25719221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
    Han DM, Chen XQ, Zhao XT, Kong Y, Li YX, Liu S, Liu B, Mo LY.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul 01; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array.
    Jolly CN, Clopton BM, Spelman FA, Lineaweaver SK.
    Med Prog Technol; 1997 Jul 01; 21 Suppl():13-23. PubMed ID: 9413824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Quantitative analysis of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in implanted children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony.
    Runge-Samuelson CL, Drake S, Wackym PA.
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb 01; 29(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 18025997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.