These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

376 related items for PubMed ID: 24333956

  • 1. Fracture resistance and cuspal deflection of incompletely excavated teeth.
    Schwendicke F, Kern M, Meyer-Lueckel H, Boels A, Doerfer C, Paris S.
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 24333956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
    Schwendicke F, Kern M, Blunck U, Dörfer C, Drenck J, Paris S.
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 25132367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of resin cements and aging on cuspal deflection and fracture resistance of teeth restored with composite resin inlays.
    Salaverry A, Borges GA, Mota EG, Burnett Júnior LH, Spohr AM.
    J Adhes Dent; 2013 Dec; 15(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 23653900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of using different bonding systems and composites on the margin integrity and the mechanical properties of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
    Schwendicke F, Kern M, Dörfer C, Kleemann-Lüpkes J, Paris S, Blunck U.
    J Dent; 2015 Mar; 43(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 25556352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
    Kalburge V, Yakub SS, Kalburge J, Hiremath H, Chandurkar A.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013 Mar; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
    Xie KX, Wang XY, Gao XJ, Yuan CY, Li JX, Chu CH.
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
    Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH.
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites.
    Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH.
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):724-30. PubMed ID: 19581032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Influence of adhesive techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with various residual wall thicknesses.
    Scotti N, Rota R, Scansetti M, Paolino DS, Chiandussi G, Pasqualini D, Berutti E.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 24095213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Does incomplete caries removal reduce strength of restored teeth?
    Hevinga MA, Opdam NJ, Frencken JE, Truin GJ, Huysmans MC.
    J Dent Res; 2010 Nov; 89(11):1270-5. PubMed ID: 20858783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of premolar cuspal deflection in bulk or in incremental composite restoration methods.
    Kim ME, Park SH.
    Oper Dent; 2011 Nov; 36(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 21827222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C, Westphal C, Becker K, Attin T.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK, Unlu N, Cetin AR, Ozkan HB.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Oct; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effect of composite fiber insertion along with low-shrinking composite resin on cuspal deflection of root-filled maxillary premolars.
    Oskoee SS, Oskoee PA, Navimipour EJ, Ajami AA, Zonuz GA, Bahari M, Pournaghiazar F.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep 01; 13(5):595-601. PubMed ID: 23250159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
    Desai PD, Das UK.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011 Sep 01; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of selective carious tissue removal on biomechanical behavior of class II bulk-fill dental composite restorations.
    Silva PFD, Oliveira LRS, Braga SSL, Signori C, Armstrong SR, Soares CJ, Cenci MS, Faria-E-Silva AL.
    Dent Mater; 2018 Sep 01; 34(9):1289-1298. PubMed ID: 29793795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored using current composite resins with and without resin-modified glass ionomer liner.
    Karaman E, Ozgunaltay G.
    Oper Dent; 2013 Sep 01; 38(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 23092141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Biomechanical Behavior of Extensively Restored Premolars: Cusp Deformation, Marginal Integrity, and Fracture Resistance.
    Barreto Bde C, Van Meerbeek B, Van Ende A, Sousa SJ, Silva GR, Soares PV, Soares CJ.
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Jun 01; 17(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 26159126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.