These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
534 related items for PubMed ID: 24335024
1. Separating the contributions of olivocochlear and middle ear muscle reflexes in modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emission levels. Wolter NE, Harrison RV, James AL. Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24335024 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [A study on the contralateral suppressive effects of distortion product otoacoustic emissions]. Wang H, Zhong N. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 11(11):489-92. PubMed ID: 10323015 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips. Wagner W, Heppelmann G, Müller J, Janssen T, Zenner HP. Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 17137736 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ear canal pressure variations versus negative middle ear pressure: comparison using distortion product otoacoustic emission measurement in humans. Sun XM. Ear Hear; 2012 Jan; 33(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 21747284 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults. Dreisbach LE, Long KM, Lees SE. Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the middle-ear muscle reflex in human ears. Sun XM. Hear Res; 2008 Mar; 237(1-2):66-75. PubMed ID: 18258398 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of negative middle ear pressure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and application of a compensation procedure in humans. Sun XM, Shaver MD. Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 19194291 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Contralateral suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: a potential diagnostic tool to evaluate the vestibular nerve. Chang MY, Song JJ, Kim JS, Koo JW. Med Hypotheses; 2013 Nov; 81(5):830-3. PubMed ID: 24074898 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression. Sun XM. J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4310-20. PubMed ID: 18537382 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs]. Kong W, Yang Y, Zhang W. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure. Johnson TA, Baranowski LG. Ear Hear; 2012 Aug; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Postnatal maturation of contralateral DPOAE suppression in a precocious animal model (chinchilla) of the human neonate. Harrison RV, Konomi U, Kanotra S, James AL. Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Apr; 133(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 23373512 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise. Büki B, Wit HP, Avan P. Brain Res; 2000 Jan 03; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]