These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

363 related items for PubMed ID: 24337315

  • 1. In vitro culture increases the frequency of stochastic epigenetic errors at imprinted genes in placental tissues from mouse concepti produced through assisted reproductive technologies.
    de Waal E, Mak W, Calhoun S, Stein P, Ord T, Krapp C, Coutifaris C, Schultz RM, Bartolomei MS.
    Biol Reprod; 2014 Feb; 90(2):22. PubMed ID: 24337315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The epigenetic control of transposable elements and imprinted genes in newborns is affected by the mode of conception: ART versus spontaneous conception without underlying infertility.
    Choux C, Binquet C, Carmignac V, Bruno C, Chapusot C, Barberet J, Lamotte M, Sagot P, Bourc'his D, Fauque P.
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb 01; 33(2):331-340. PubMed ID: 29237055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Moderate maternal folic acid supplementation ameliorates adverse embryonic and epigenetic outcomes associated with assisted reproduction in a mouse model.
    Rahimi S, Martel J, Karahan G, Angle C, Behan NA, Chan D, MacFarlane AJ, Trasler JM.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 May 01; 34(5):851-862. PubMed ID: 30989206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Impact of assisted reproduction, infertility, sex and paternal factors on the placental DNA methylome.
    Choufani S, Turinsky AL, Melamed N, Greenblatt E, Brudno M, Bérard A, Fraser WD, Weksberg R, Trasler J, Monnier P, 3D cohort study group.
    Hum Mol Genet; 2019 Feb 01; 28(3):372-385. PubMed ID: 30239726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. In-utero stress and mode of conception: impact on regulation of imprinted genes, fetal development and future health.
    Argyraki M, Damdimopoulou P, Chatzimeletiou K, Grimbizis GF, Tarlatzis BC, Syrrou M, Lambropoulos A.
    Hum Reprod Update; 2019 Nov 05; 25(6):777-801. PubMed ID: 31633761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The loss of imprinted DNA methylation in mouse blastocysts is inflicted to a similar extent by in vitro follicle culture and ovulation induction.
    Saenz-de-Juano MD, Billooye K, Smitz J, Anckaert E.
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2016 Jun 05; 22(6):427-41. PubMed ID: 26908643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Stability of genomic imprinting and gestational-age dynamic methylation in complicated pregnancies conceived following assisted reproductive technologies.
    Camprubí C, Iglesias-Platas I, Martin-Trujillo A, Salvador-Alarcon C, Rodriguez MA, Barredo DR, Court F, Monk D.
    Biol Reprod; 2013 Sep 05; 89(3):50. PubMed ID: 23884645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Perturbations in imprinted methylation from assisted reproductive technologies but not advanced maternal age in mouse preimplantation embryos.
    Kindsfather AJ, Czekalski MA, Pressimone CA, Erisman MP, Mann MRW.
    Clin Epigenetics; 2019 Nov 26; 11(1):162. PubMed ID: 31767035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Manipulations of mouse embryos prior to implantation result in aberrant expression of imprinted genes on day 9.5 of development.
    Rivera RM, Stein P, Weaver JR, Mager J, Schultz RM, Bartolomei MS.
    Hum Mol Genet; 2008 Jan 01; 17(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 17901045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Higher incidence of embryonic defects in mouse offspring conceived with assisted reproduction from fathers with sperm epimutations.
    Karahan G, Martel J, Rahimi S, Farag M, Matias F, MacFarlane AJ, Chan D, Trasler J.
    Hum Mol Genet; 2023 Dec 12; 33(1):48-63. PubMed ID: 37740387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Side-by-side comparison of five commercial media systems in a mouse model: suboptimal in vitro culture interferes with imprint maintenance.
    Market-Velker BA, Fernandes AD, Mann MR.
    Biol Reprod; 2010 Dec 12; 83(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 20702853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Assisted reproduction causes placental maldevelopment and dysfunction linked to reduced fetal weight in mice.
    Chen S, Sun FZ, Huang X, Wang X, Tang N, Zhu B, Li B.
    Sci Rep; 2015 Jun 18; 5():10596. PubMed ID: 26085229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Placental imprinting variation associated with assisted reproductive technologies and subfertility.
    Litzky JF, Deyssenroth MA, Everson TM, Armstrong DA, Lambertini L, Chen J, Marsit CJ.
    Epigenetics; 2017 Aug 18; 12(8):653-661. PubMed ID: 28621618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Do assisted reproductive technologies and in vitro embryo culture influence the epigenetic control of imprinted genes and transposable elements in children?
    Barberet J, Binquet C, Guilleman M, Doukani A, Choux C, Bruno C, Bourredjem A, Chapusot C, Bourc'his D, Duffourd Y, Fauque P.
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Jan 25; 36(2):479-492. PubMed ID: 33319250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The effects of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on genomic imprinting in the placenta.
    Rhon-Calderon EA, Vrooman LA, Riesche L, Bartolomei MS.
    Placenta; 2019 Sep 01; 84():37-43. PubMed ID: 30871810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. IVF results in de novo DNA methylation and histone methylation at an Igf2-H19 imprinting epigenetic switch.
    Li T, Vu TH, Ulaner GA, Littman E, Ling JQ, Chen HL, Hu JF, Behr B, Giudice L, Hoffman AR.
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2005 Sep 01; 11(9):631-40. PubMed ID: 16219628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Assisted reproductive technology and imprinting errors: analyzing underlying mechanisms from epigenetic regulation.
    Zhang G, Mao Y, Zhang Y, Huang H, Pan J.
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2023 Oct 01; 26(4):864-878. PubMed ID: 37929309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Loss of methylation of H19-imprinted gene derived from assisted reproductive technologies can be mitigated by cleavage-stage embryo transfer in mice.
    Chen S, Zhang M, Li L, Wang M, Shi Y, Zhang H, Kang B, Tang N, Li B.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Nov 01; 36(11):2259-2269. PubMed ID: 31515683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.
    Okun N, Sierra S, GENETICS COMMITTEE, SPECIAL CONTRIBUTORS.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jan 01; 36(1):64-83. PubMed ID: 24444289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.