These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception. Hirschfelder A, Gräbel S, Olze H. Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Does pediatric cochlear implant insertion technique affect intraoperative neural response telemetry thresholds? Poley M, Overmyer E, Craun P, Holcomb M, Reilly B, White D, Preciado D. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1404-7. PubMed ID: 26166451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of cochlear implant age and duration of intervention on ESRT in children with cochlear implant. Tyagi Y, Chatterjee I. Cochlear Implants Int; 2023 Jul; 24(4):224-234. PubMed ID: 37302120 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of total intravenous anaesthesia on intraoperative monitoring of cochlear implant function in paediatric patients. Jana JJ, Vaid N, Shanbhag J. Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 23510661 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Comparison of neural response telemetry thresholds with behavioral T/C levels]. Chen X, Han D, Zhao X, Wang S, Kong Y, Liu S, Mo L, Liu B, Wu Y. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Dec; 37(6):435-9. PubMed ID: 12966804 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Correlation between neural response telemetry measurements and fitting levels. Ries M, Kelava I, Ajduk J, Košec A, Žaja R, Trotić R. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 182():112001. PubMed ID: 38885546 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Electrophysiologic and objective monitoring of the cochlear implant during surgery: implementation, audit and outcomes. Mason S. Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S33-8. PubMed ID: 15732380 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study. Mittmann P, Todt I, Ernst A, Rademacher G, Mutze S, Göricke S, Schlamann M, Ramalingam R, Lang S, Christov F, Arweiler-Harbeck D. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 273(12):4251-4256. PubMed ID: 27351885 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children. Wackym PA, Firszt JB, Gaggl W, Runge-Samuelson CL, Reeder RM, Raulie JC. Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Differences between electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and behavioral measures in children with cochlear implants operated in the school age vs. operated in the first years of life. Vlahović S, Šindija B, Aras I, Glunčić M, Trotić R. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 76(5):731-9. PubMed ID: 22398117 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]