These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

388 related items for PubMed ID: 24368138

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Simultaneous suppression of noise and reverberation in cochlear implants using a ratio masking strategy.
    Hazrati O, Sadjadi SO, Loizou PC, Hansen JH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3759-65. PubMed ID: 24180786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect of visual cues on top-down restoration of temporally interrupted speech, with and without further degradations.
    Benard MR, Başkent D.
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():24-33. PubMed ID: 26117407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
    Marcrum SC, Picou EM, Steffens T.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.
    Oxenham AJ, Kreft HA.
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct 13; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
    Bonnard D, Schwalje A, Gantz B, Choi I.
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep 13; 367():223-230. PubMed ID: 29980380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Simulating the effect of interaural mismatch in the insertion depth of bilateral cochlear implants on speech perception.
    van Besouw RM, Forrester L, Crowe ND, Rowan D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug 13; 134(2):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23927131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A beamformer post-filter for cochlear implant noise reduction.
    Hersbach AA, Grayden DB, Fallon JB, McDermott HJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr 13; 133(4):2412-20. PubMed ID: 23556606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Spectral density affects the intelligibility of tone-vocoded speech: Implications for cochlear implant simulations.
    Rosen S, Zhang Y, Speers K.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep 13; 138(3):EL318-23. PubMed ID: 26428833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effects of reverberant self- and overlap-masking on speech recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
    Desmond JM, Collins LM, Throckmorton CS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun 13; 135(6):EL304-10. PubMed ID: 24907838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Pitch and spectral resolution: A systematic comparison of bottom-up cues for top-down repair of degraded speech.
    Clarke J, Başkent D, Gaudrain E.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan 13; 139(1):395-405. PubMed ID: 26827034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.