These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage. Sar C, Arman-Özçırpıcı A, Uçkan S, Yazıcı AC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment. Ngan P, Wilmes B, Drescher D, Martin C, Weaver B, Gunel E. Prog Orthod; 2015 May; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of 2 skeletally anchored maxillary protraction protocols. Elnagar MH, Elshourbagy E, Ghobashy S, Khedr M, Evans CA. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):751-762. PubMed ID: 27871701 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients. De Clerck H, Cevidanes L, Baccetti T. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):577-81. PubMed ID: 21055597 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Soft and hard tissue profile changes after rapid maxillary expansion and face mask therapy. Kurt G, Uysal T, Yagci A. World J Orthod; 2010 Nov; 11(4):e10-8. PubMed ID: 21490978 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of intermaxillary forces in early treatment of maxillary deficient class III patients: results of a case series. Coscia G, Addabbo F, Peluso V, D'Ambrosio E. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e350-4. PubMed ID: 22421469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of facemask treatment anchored with miniplates after alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions; a pilot study. Kaya D, Kocadereli I, Kan B, Tasar F. Angle Orthod; 2011 Jul; 81(4):639-46. PubMed ID: 21299407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy. Macdonald KE, Kapust AJ, Turley PK. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10393575 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents. Chen L, Chen R, Yang Y, Ji G, Shen G. Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of face mask treatment with and without rapid maxillary expansion in young adult subjects. Halicioglu K, Yavuz I, Ceylan I, Erdem A. Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):853-61. PubMed ID: 24628408 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion. Cozza P, Baccetti T, Mucedero M, Pavoni C, Franchi L. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing Class III patient. Cha BK, Choi DS, Ngan P, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Kim SM, Jang IS. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 21195283 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study. Fontana M, Cozzani M, Caprioglio A. Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Corticotomy-assisted maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage and Class III elastics. Yilmaz HN, Garip H, Satilmis T, Kucukkeles N. Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 24913740 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]