These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

444 related items for PubMed ID: 24374589

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
    Levy JI, Clougherty JE, Baxter LK, Houseman EA, Paciorek CJ, HEI Health Review Committee.
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Human-model hybrid Korean air quality forecasting system.
    Chang LS, Cho A, Park H, Nam K, Kim D, Hong JH, Song CK.
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Sep; 66(9):896-911. PubMed ID: 27450767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. GPS-ZTD data assimilation and its impact on wintertime haze prediction over North China Plain using WRF 3DVAR and CMAQ modeling system.
    Gao L, Liu Z, Chen D, Yan P, Zhang Y, Hu H, Liang H, Liang X.
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Dec; 28(48):68523-68538. PubMed ID: 34273077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Performance evaluation of air quality models for predicting PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at urban traffic intersection during winter period.
    Gokhale S, Raokhande N.
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 May 01; 394(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 18289641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparative study of two-way and offline coupled WRF v3.4 and CMAQ v5.0.2 over the contiguous US: performance evaluation and impacts of chemistry-meteorology feedbacks on air quality.
    Wang K, Zhang Y, Yu S, Wong DC, Pleim J, Mathur R, Kelly JT, Bell M.
    Geosci Model Dev; 2021 Nov 26; 14(11):7189-7221. PubMed ID: 35237388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Linear and nonlinear modeling approaches for urban air quality prediction.
    Singh KP, Gupta S, Kumar A, Shukla SP.
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jun 01; 426():244-55. PubMed ID: 22542239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Impacts of transportation sector emissions on future U.S. air quality in a changing climate. Part I: Projected emissions, simulation design, and model evaluation.
    Campbell P, Zhang Y, Yan F, Lu Z, Streets D.
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Jul 01; 238():903-917. PubMed ID: 29677550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The importance of spatial resolutions of Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) models on health impact assessment.
    Jiang X, Yoo EH.
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun 15; 627():1528-1543. PubMed ID: 30857114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.