These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


162 related items for PubMed ID: 24380136

  • 1. The evidence supporting methods of tooth width measurement: Part II. Digital models and intra-oral scanners.
    Naidu D, Freer TJ.
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 Nov; 29(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 24380136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The evidence supporting methods of tooth width measurement: Part I. Vernier calipers to stereophotogrammetry.
    Naidu D, Freer TJ.
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 Nov; 29(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 24380135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment.
    Fasbinder DJ.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Nov; 31 Spec No 4():2-11; quiz 12. PubMed ID: 21049823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. On the augmented reproducibility in measurements on 3D orthodontic digital dental models and the definition of feature points.
    Jacquet W, Nyssen E, Ibel G, Vannet BV.
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 23785935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study.
    Cuperus AM, Harms MC, Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JG, Breuning KH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Sep; 142(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 22920696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Examination of Bolton Index comparing the traditional method with a 2-dimensional digital measurement method.
    Roşu S, Zetu I, Ogodescu A, Veiszenbacher E, Mártha KI.
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2014 Sep; 118(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 24741801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios.
    Naidu D, Freer TJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):304-10. PubMed ID: 23910212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models.
    Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 12828439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Digital dental photography. Part 1: an overview.
    Ahmad I.
    Br Dent J; 2009 Apr 25; 206(8):403-7. PubMed ID: 19396199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Digital technology in the orthodontic laboratory.
    Hurt AJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb 25; 141(2):245-7. PubMed ID: 22284293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The reliability and validity of measurements of human dental casts made by an intra-oral 3D scanner, with conventional hand-held digital callipers as the comparison measure.
    Rajshekar M, Julian R, Williams AM, Tennant M, Forrest A, Walsh LJ, Wilson G, Blizzard L.
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep 25; 278():198-204. PubMed ID: 28738248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts?
    Dowling AH, Burns A, Macauley D, Garvey TM, Fleming GJ.
    J Dent; 2013 Dec 25; 41(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 24012518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. New, fast, and accurate procedure to calibrate a 2-dimensional digital measurement method.
    Paredes V, Gandia JL, Cibrian R.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr 25; 127(4):518-9. PubMed ID: 15821697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Predicting tooth-size discrepancy: A new formula utilizing revised landmarks and 3-dimensional laser scanning technology.
    Bailey E, Nelson G, Miller AJ, Andrews L, Johnson E.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr 25; 143(4):574-85. PubMed ID: 23561420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A clinical photogrammetric method to measure dental arch dimensions and mesio-distal tooth size.
    Normando D, da Silva PL, Mendes ÁM.
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec 25; 33(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 21282283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Gingival volume measurement through the analysis of tooth crown area: a digital and computed method.
    Rodrigues GG, Madureira DF, Lages EM, Lages EJ, Pretti H.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Oct 25; 32(5):591-6. PubMed ID: 22754906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Digital photography and your laboratory.
    Goldstein MB.
    Dent Today; 2008 Aug 25; 27(8):120, 122-3. PubMed ID: 18717411
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Determination of Bolton tooth-size ratios by digitization, and comparison with the traditional method.
    Paredes V, Gandia JL, Cibrian R.
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr 25; 28(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 16373454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of methods for measurement of hypoplastic lesions.
    Elcock C, Smith RN, Simpson J, Abdellatif A, Bäckman B, Brook AH.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 May 25; 114 Suppl 1():365-9; discussion 375-6, 382-3. PubMed ID: 16674714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.