These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

253 related items for PubMed ID: 24384084

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Diagnostic Hearing Assessment in Schools: Validity and Time Efficiency of Automated Audiometry.
    Mahomed-Asmail F, Swanepoel de W, Eikelboom RH.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 26809325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Pure-tone audiometry outside a sound booth using earphone attentuation, integrated noise monitoring, and automation.
    Swanepoel de W, Matthysen C, Eikelboom RH, Clark JL, Hall JW.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan; 54(11):777-85. PubMed ID: 26514954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer.
    Eikelboom RH, Swanepoel de W, Motakef S, Upson GS.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23548148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of air-conduction and bone-conduction hearing thresholds for pure tones and octave-band filtered sound effects.
    Abouchacra KS, Letowski T.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Sep; 10(8):422-8. PubMed ID: 10813642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Development and evaluation of a tablet-based diagnostic audiometer.
    Thoidis I, Vrysis L, Markou K, Papanikolaou G.
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 58(8):476-483. PubMed ID: 30987489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
    Bromwich MA, Parsa V, Lanthier N, Yoo J, Parnes LS.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.
    Baldwin M, Watkin P.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Jan; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Use of noise cancellation earphones in out-of-booth audiometric evaluations.
    Clark JG, Brady M, Earl BR, Scheifele PM, Snyder L, Clark SD.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):989-996. PubMed ID: 28783994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. AMTAS(®): automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: III. sensorineural hearing loss and air-bone gaps.
    Margolis RH, Moore BC.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):440-7. PubMed ID: 21668325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Pure-tone audiometry without bone-conduction thresholds: using the digits-in-noise test to detect conductive hearing loss.
    De Sousa KC, Smits C, Moore DR, Myburgh HC, Swanepoel W.
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Oct; 59(10):801-808. PubMed ID: 32609044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA, Reed CM, Robinson SR, Perez ZD.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Oct; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Ambient noise impact on accuracy of automated hearing assessment.
    Storey KK, Muñoz K, Nelson L, Larsen J, White K.
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Oct; 53(10):730-6. PubMed ID: 24909592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.