These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

328 related items for PubMed ID: 24384680

  • 1. MR angiography at 3 Tesla to assess proximal internal carotid artery stenoses: contrast-enhanced or 3D time-of-flight MR angiography?
    Weber J, Veith P, Jung B, Ihorst G, Moske-Eick O, Meckel S, Urbach H, Taschner CA.
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24384680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for internal carotid artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Debrey SM, Yu H, Lynch JK, Lövblad KO, Wright VL, Janket SJ, Baird AE.
    Stroke; 2008 Aug; 39(8):2237-48. PubMed ID: 18556586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Korn A, Bender B, Brodoefel H, Hauser TK, Danz S, Ernemann U, Thomas C.
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24343701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of chronic carotid artery occlusion by non-contrast 3D-MERGE MR vessel wall imaging: comparison with 3D-TOF-MRA, contrast-enhanced MRA, and DSA.
    Zhang J, Ding S, Zhao H, Sun B, Li X, Zhou Y, Wan J, Degnan AJ, Xu J, Zhu C.
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5805-5814. PubMed ID: 32529567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography is not more accurate than unenhanced 2D time-of-flight MR angiography for determining > or = 70% internal carotid artery stenosis.
    Babiarz LS, Romero JM, Murphy EK, Brobeck B, Schaefer PW, González RG, Lev MH.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Apr; 30(4):761-8. PubMed ID: 19164440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms at 3T: comparison of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Cirillo M, Righi C, Simionato F, Cadioli M, Iadanza A, Kirchin MA, Scotti G.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 Sep; 29(8):1530-6. PubMed ID: 18556359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. MR imaging: influence of imaging technique and postprocessing on measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis.
    Runck F, Steiner RP, Bautz WA, Lell MM.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 Oct; 29(9):1736-42. PubMed ID: 18635618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography: Diagnostic performance of four doses for detection and grading of carotid, renal, and aorto-iliac stenoses compared to digital subtraction angiography.
    Schneider G, Ballarati C, Grazioli L, Manfredi R, Thurnher S, Kroencke TJ, Taupitz M, Merlino B, Bonomo L, Shen N, Pirovano G, Kirchin MA, Spinazzi A.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):1020-32. PubMed ID: 17896354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of the occlusion status of coiled intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography at 3T: is contrast enhancement necessary?
    Sprengers ME, Schaafsma JD, van Rooij WJ, van den Berg R, Rinkel GJ, Akkerman EM, Ferns SP, Majoie CB.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Oct; 30(9):1665-71. PubMed ID: 19628623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Assessment of apparent internal carotid occlusion on ultrasound: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Hammond CJ, McPherson SJ, Patel JV, Gough MJ.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 35(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 18262445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using three different techniques: accuracy compared with intraarterial x-ray angiography and endarterectomy specimens.
    Fellner C, Lang W, Janka R, Wutke R, Bautz W, Fellner FA.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 21(4):424-31. PubMed ID: 15779039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.