These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

335 related items for PubMed ID: 24392845

  • 1. Protein NMR structures refined with Rosetta have higher accuracy relative to corresponding X-ray crystal structures.
    Mao B, Tejero R, Baker D, Montelione GT.
    J Am Chem Soc; 2014 Feb 05; 136(5):1893-906. PubMed ID: 24392845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Improving NMR protein structure quality by Rosetta refinement: a molecular replacement study.
    Ramelot TA, Raman S, Kuzin AP, Xiao R, Ma LC, Acton TB, Hunt JF, Montelione GT, Baker D, Kennedy MA.
    Proteins; 2009 Apr 05; 75(1):147-67. PubMed ID: 18816799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of NMR and crystal structures of membrane proteins and computational refinement to improve model quality.
    Koehler Leman J, D'Avino AR, Bhatnagar Y, Gray JJ.
    Proteins; 2018 Jan 05; 86(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 29044728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Determination of solution structures of proteins up to 40 kDa using CS-Rosetta with sparse NMR data from deuterated samples.
    Lange OF, Rossi P, Sgourakis NG, Song Y, Lee HW, Aramini JM, Ertekin A, Xiao R, Acton TB, Montelione GT, Baker D.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Jul 03; 109(27):10873-8. PubMed ID: 22733734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accurate automated protein NMR structure determination using unassigned NOESY data.
    Raman S, Huang YJ, Mao B, Rossi P, Aramini JM, Liu G, Montelione GT, Baker D.
    J Am Chem Soc; 2010 Jan 13; 132(1):202-7. PubMed ID: 20000319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Robust and highly accurate automatic NOESY assignment and structure determination with Rosetta.
    Zhang Z, Porter J, Tripsianes K, Lange OF.
    J Biomol NMR; 2014 Jul 13; 59(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 24845473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Improved technologies now routinely provide protein NMR structures useful for molecular replacement.
    Mao B, Guan R, Montelione GT.
    Structure; 2011 Jun 08; 19(6):757-66. PubMed ID: 21645849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of X-ray and NMR structures: is there a systematic difference in residue contacts between X-ray- and NMR-resolved protein structures?
    Garbuzynskiy SO, Melnik BS, Lobanov MY, Finkelstein AV, Galzitskaya OV.
    Proteins; 2005 Jul 01; 60(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 15856480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. De novo protein structure generation from incomplete chemical shift assignments.
    Shen Y, Vernon R, Baker D, Bax A.
    J Biomol NMR; 2009 Feb 01; 43(2):63-78. PubMed ID: 19034676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Systematic evaluation of CS-Rosetta for membrane protein structure prediction with sparse NOE restraints.
    Reichel K, Fisette O, Braun T, Lange OF, Hummer G, Schäfer LV.
    Proteins; 2017 May 01; 85(5):812-826. PubMed ID: 27936510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Refinement of NMR structures using implicit solvent and advanced sampling techniques.
    Chen J, Im W, Brooks CL.
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Dec 15; 126(49):16038-47. PubMed ID: 15584737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Recent Advances in NMR Protein Structure Prediction with ROSETTA.
    Koehler Leman J, Künze G.
    Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Apr 25; 24(9):. PubMed ID: 37175539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Resolution-adapted recombination of structural features significantly improves sampling in restraint-guided structure calculation.
    Lange OF, Baker D.
    Proteins; 2012 Mar 25; 80(3):884-95. PubMed ID: 22423358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Simulated annealing with restrained molecular dynamics using CONGEN: energy refinement of the NMR solution structures of epidermal and type-alpha transforming growth factors.
    Tejero R, Bassolino-Klimas D, Bruccoleri RE, Montelione GT.
    Protein Sci; 1996 Apr 25; 5(4):578-92. PubMed ID: 8845748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Alternate states of proteins revealed by detailed energy landscape mapping.
    Tyka MD, Keedy DA, André I, Dimaio F, Song Y, Richardson DC, Richardson JS, Baker D.
    J Mol Biol; 2011 Jan 14; 405(2):607-18. PubMed ID: 21073878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Validation of X-ray Crystal Structure Ensemble Representations of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease by Solution NMR Residual Dipolar Couplings.
    Shen Y, Robertson AJ, Bax A.
    J Mol Biol; 2023 Jun 01; 435(11):168067. PubMed ID: 37330294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. How to tackle protein structural data from solution and solid state: An integrated approach.
    Carlon A, Ravera E, Andrałojć W, Parigi G, Murshudov GN, Luchinat C.
    Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc; 2016 Feb 01; 92-93():54-70. PubMed ID: 26952192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. TASSER-based refinement of NMR structures.
    Lee SY, Zhang Y, Skolnick J.
    Proteins; 2006 May 15; 63(3):451-6. PubMed ID: 16456861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluating protein structures determined by structural genomics consortia.
    Bhattacharya A, Tejero R, Montelione GT.
    Proteins; 2007 Mar 01; 66(4):778-95. PubMed ID: 17186527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A community resource of experimental data for NMR / X-ray crystal structure pairs.
    Everett JK, Tejero R, Murthy SB, Acton TB, Aramini JM, Baran MC, Benach J, Cort JR, Eletsky A, Forouhar F, Guan R, Kuzin AP, Lee HW, Liu G, Mani R, Mao B, Mills JL, Montelione AF, Pederson K, Powers R, Ramelot T, Rossi P, Seetharaman J, Snyder D, Swapna GV, Vorobiev SM, Wu Y, Xiao R, Yang Y, Arrowsmith CH, Hunt JF, Kennedy MA, Prestegard JH, Szyperski T, Tong L, Montelione GT.
    Protein Sci; 2016 Jan 01; 25(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 26293815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.