These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
178 related items for PubMed ID: 24397356
21. The change of spherical aberration during accommodation and its effect on the accommodation response. López-Gil N, Fernández-Sánchez V. J Vis; 2010 Nov 12; 10(13):12. PubMed ID: 21075837 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. On the Stiles-Crawford effect and ocular imagery. Olsen T. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1993 Feb 12; 71(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 8475719 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of image quality metrics for the prediction of subjective best focus. Kilintari M, Pallikaris A, Tsiklis N, Ginis HS. Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Mar 12; 87(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 20125061 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of Pupil Diameter on Objective Refraction Determination and Predicted Visual Acuity. Anderson HA, Ravikumar A, Benoit JS, Marsack JD. Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2019 Nov 12; 8(6):32. PubMed ID: 31857915 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, Applegate RA. J Vis; 2004 Apr 23; 4(4):329-51. PubMed ID: 15134480 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of objective and subjective refraction before and after laser in situ keratomileusis. Salchow DJ, Zirm ME, Stieldorf C, Parisi A. J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Jun 23; 25(6):827-35. PubMed ID: 10374165 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of Stiles-Crawford effect apodization on spatial visual performance with decentered pupils. Atchison DA, Scott DH, Joblin A, Smith G. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2001 Jun 23; 18(6):1201-11. PubMed ID: 11393612 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]