These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
577 related items for PubMed ID: 24417462
1. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix. Ashwal E, Hiersch L, Melamed N, Manor Y, Wiznitzer A, Hod M, Yogev Y. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Second dose of PGE2 vaginal insert versus Foley transcervical balloon for induction of labor after failure of cervical ripening with PGE2 vaginal insert. Mohr-Sasson A, Schiff E, Sindel O, Suday RR, Kalter-Farber A, Mashiach R, Yinon Y, Dulitzki M, Sivan E, Mazaki-Tovi S. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Sep; 30(17):2074-2077. PubMed ID: 27633399 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial. Facchinetti F, Venturini P, Verocchi G, Volpe A. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr 01; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations. Facchinetti F, Venturini P, Fazzio M, Volpe A. J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct 01; 52(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 17977171 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert: a meta-analysis. Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Delke I, Gaudier FL. Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov 01; 94(5 Pt 2):878-83. PubMed ID: 10546777 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study. Chowdhary A, Bagga R, Jasvinder Kalra, Jain V, Saha SC, Kumar P. J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May 01; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre-induction cervical ripening using two different dinoprostone vaginal preparations: A randomized clinical trial of tablets and slow release retrievable insert. Abdelaziz A, Mahmoud AA, Ellaithy MI, Abees SH. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug 01; 57(4):560-566. PubMed ID: 30122579 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4. Triglia MT, Palamara F, Lojacono A, Prefumo F, Frusca T. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May 01; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Wing DA, Ortiz-Omphroy G, Paul RH. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep 01; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system]. Veerman HM. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Jan 08; 149(2):105-6; author reply 106. PubMed ID: 15688844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening. Dalui R, Suri V, Ray P, Gupta I. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr 08; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system]. Brouwers JM, Briët JW, Brouwers JR. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jun 26; 148(26):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15279216 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrospective Comparison of PGE2 Vaginal Insert and Foley Catheter for Outpatient Cervical Ripening. Blair R, Harvey MA, Pudwell J, Bougie O. J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 Sep 26; 42(9):1103-1110. PubMed ID: 32482470 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial. Ozkan S, Calişkan E, Doğer E, Yücesoy I, Ozeren S, Vural B. Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul 26; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. Chang CH, Chang FM. J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May 26; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Cook vaginal cervical ripening balloon with prostaglandin E2 insert for induction of labor in late pregnancy. Wang L, Wang G, Cao W, Guo L, Hu H, Li Y, Zhang Q. Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Sep 26; 302(3):579-584. PubMed ID: 32617665 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial. Denguezli W, Trimech A, Haddad A, Hajjaji A, Saidani Z, Faleh R, Sakouhi M. Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug 26; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term]. Grange J, Dimet J, Vital M, Le Thuaut A, Ducarme G. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct 26; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparative efficacy of vaginal insert and dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening at term in current practice]. Denoual-Ziad C, Hors Y, Delande I, Lezin B, Herlicoviez M, Dreyfus M. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2005 Feb 26; 34(1 Pt 1):62-8. PubMed ID: 15767919 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]