These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

308 related items for PubMed ID: 24456630

  • 21. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces.
    Fourie Z, Ozcan M, Sandham A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19577138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Effects of levelling of the curve of Spee on the proclination of mandibular incisors and expansion of dental arches: a prospective clinical trial.
    Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Sifakakis I, Makou M, Eliades T.
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 20575202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Effects of self-ligating brackets on the surfaces of stainless steel wires following clinical use: AFM investigation.
    Choi S, Joo HJ, Cheong Y, Park YG, Park HK.
    J Microsc; 2012 Apr; 246(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 22188518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial.
    Scott P, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):470.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18929262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Canine retraction and anchorage loss: self-ligating versus conventional brackets in a randomized split-mouth study.
    da Costa Monini A, Júnior LG, Martins RP, Vianna AP.
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 24592906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Commercially available archwire forms compared with normal dental arch forms in a Japanese population.
    Oda S, Arai K, Nakahara R.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 20362913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. In vitro biomechanical analysis of torque capabilities of various 0.018″ lingual bracket-wire systems: total torque play and slot size.
    Daratsianos N, Bourauel C, Fimmers R, Jäger A, Schwestka-Polly R.
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Oct; 38(5):459-69. PubMed ID: 26518759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Comparison of the kinetic frictional force between conventional plastic brackets with thermoplastic low-friction module ligation and self-ligating brackets.
    Yanase Y, Ioi H, Uehara M, Hara A, Nakata S, Nakasima A, Counts AL.
    World J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 10(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 19885424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Porcelain brackets during initial alignment: are self-ligating cosmetic brackets more efficient?
    Miles P, Weyant R.
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 20575195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Does the design of self-ligating brackets show different behavior in terms of friction?
    Tecco S, Marzo G, Di Bisceglie B, Crincoli V, Tetè S, Festa F.
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011 May; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 22299106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A clinical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants as intraoral anchorage for the intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth.
    Saxena R, Kumar PS, Upadhyay M, Naik V.
    World J Orthod; 2010 May; 11(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 21491000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. A comparative evaluation of metallurgical properties of stainless steel and TMA archwires with timolium and titanium niobium archwires--an in vitro study.
    Vijayalakshmi RD, Nagachandran KS, Kummi P, Jayakumar P.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009 May; 20(4):448-52. PubMed ID: 20139569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. The comparison of frictional resistance in titanium, self-ligating stainless steel, and stainless steel brackets using stainless steel and TMA archwires: An in vitro study.
    Khalid SA, Kumar V, Jayaram P.
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2012 Aug; 4(Suppl 2):S203-11. PubMed ID: 23066253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Cephalometric analysis of dental and skeletal changes following treatment with a passive self-ligating system.
    Ehsani S, Carlyle T, El-Bialy T, Kusnoto B.
    J Clin Orthod; 2012 May; 46(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 22785041
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Extrusion-based leveling with segmented arch mechanics.
    Noroozi H, Moeinzad H.
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002 May; 17(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 11934055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Patil S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.