These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

284 related items for PubMed ID: 24471388

  • 1. Iterative image reconstruction techniques for CT coronary artery calcium quantification: comparison with traditional filtered back projection in vitro and in vivo.
    Schindler A, Vliegenthart R, Schoepf UJ, Blanke P, Ebersberger U, Cho YJ, Allmendinger T, Vogt S, Raupach R, Fink C, Saam T, Bamberg F, Nikolaou K, Apfaltrer P.
    Radiology; 2014 Feb; 270(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 24471388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
    Blobel J, Mews J, Schuijf JD, Overlaet W.
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: Impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality.
    Tesche C, De Cecco CN, Schoepf UJ, Duguay TM, Albrecht MH, Caruso D, Varga-Szemes A, Lesslie VW, Ebersberger U, Canstein C, Thilo C, Hoffmann E, Allmendinger T, Nance JW.
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017 Dec; 11(5):354-359. PubMed ID: 28756086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction.
    Renker M, Nance JW, Schoepf UJ, O'Brien TX, Zwerner PL, Meyer M, Kerl JM, Bauer RW, Fink C, Vogl TJ, Henzler T.
    Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):390-9. PubMed ID: 21693660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in quantifying coronary calcium.
    Takahashi M, Kimura F, Umezawa T, Watanabe Y, Ogawa H.
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016 Aug; 10(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 26276567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. CT coronary angiography: image quality with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction compared with filtered back-projection.
    Wang R, Schoepf UJ, Wu R, Gibbs KP, Yu W, Li M, Zhang Z.
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Mar; 68(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 22981731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography: comparison of filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction with different strengths.
    Wang R, Schoepf UJ, Wu R, Nance JW, Lv B, Yang H, Li F, Lu D, Zhang Z.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014 Mar; 38(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 24625599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The Influence of Iterative Reconstruction on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring-Phantom and Clinical Studies.
    Oda S, Utsunomiya D, Nakaura T, Funama Y, Yuki H, Kidoh M, Hirata K, Taguchi N, Honda K, Takaoka H, Iyama Y, Katahira K, Noda K, Oshima S, Tokuyasu S, Yamashita Y.
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 27913107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Impact of iterative reconstruction on CT coronary calcium quantification.
    Kurata A, Dharampal A, Dedic A, de Feyter PJ, Krestin GP, Dijkshoorn ML, Nieman K.
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Dec; 23(12):3246-52. PubMed ID: 24057202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Ultra-low peak voltage CT colonography: effect of iterative reconstruction algorithms on performance of radiologists who use anthropomorphic colonic phantoms.
    Shin CI, Kim SH, Lee ES, Lee DH, Hwang EJ, Chung SY, Lee JM, Han JK, Choi BI.
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):759-71. PubMed ID: 25010640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of the effect of iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection on cardiac CT postprocessing.
    Spears JR, Schoepf UJ, Henzler T, Joshi G, Moscariello A, Vliegenthart R, Cho YJ, Apfaltrer P, Rowe G, Weininger M, Ebersberger U.
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):318-24. PubMed ID: 24360635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Submillisievert coronary calcium quantification using model-based iterative reconstruction: A within-patient analysis.
    den Harder AM, Wolterink JM, Willemink MJ, Schilham AMR, de Jong PA, Budde RPJ, Nathoe HM, Išgum I, Leiner T.
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2152-2159. PubMed ID: 27776671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography.
    Kalra MK, Woisetschläger M, Dahlström N, Singh S, Lindblom M, Choy G, Quick P, Schmidt B, Sedlmair M, Blake MA, Persson A.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012 Nov; 36(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 22592621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.