These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

371 related items for PubMed ID: 24472002

  • 1. One- vs 4-week stent placement after laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty: results of a prospective randomised single-centre study.
    Danuser H, Germann C, Pelzer N, Rühle A, Stucki P, Mattei A.
    BJU Int; 2014 Jun; 113(6):931-5. PubMed ID: 24472002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre.
    Schwentner C, Pelzer A, Neururer R, Springer B, Horninger W, Bartsch G, Peschel R.
    BJU Int; 2007 Oct; 100(4):880-5. PubMed ID: 17535275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study.
    Riachy E, Cost NG, Defoor WR, Reddy PP, Minevich EA, Noh PH.
    J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):283-7. PubMed ID: 23174238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Outcome analysis of robotic pyeloplasty: a large single-centre experience.
    Gupta NP, Nayyar R, Hemal AK, Mukherjee S, Kumar R, Dogra PN.
    BJU Int; 2010 Apr; 105(7):980-3. PubMed ID: 19874304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for children with pelvic ureteric junction obstruction: an institutional experience.
    Nasir AA, Abraham MK, Sudarshan B, Puzhankara R, Kedari P.
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2014 Mar; 21(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 24887251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
    Asensio M, Gander R, Royo GF, Lloret J.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. One week stenting after pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty; is it enough?
    Abdelwahab M, Abdelaziz A, Aboulela W, Shouman AM, Ghoneima W, Shoukry A, Kassem A, Abdelhamid M, Abdelhakim M, ElGhoneimy M, Morsi H, Badawy H, Elkady A.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Feb; 16(1):98.e1-98.e6. PubMed ID: 31786228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
    Davenport K, Minervini A, Timoney AG, Keeley FX.
    Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):973-7. PubMed ID: 16171940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Standard vs mini-laparoscopic pyeloplasty: perioperative outcomes and cosmetic results.
    Fiori C, Morra I, Bertolo R, Mele F, Chiarissi ML, Porpiglia F.
    BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3 Pt B):E121-6. PubMed ID: 22788958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Computer-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: University of Miami experience with the daVinci Surgical System.
    Siddiq FM, Leveillee RJ, Villicana P, Bird VG.
    J Endourol; 2005 Apr; 19(3):387-92. PubMed ID: 15865533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Weise ES, Winfield HN.
    J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17094760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Peri-operative outcomes and complications after laparoscopic vs robot-assisted dismembered pyeloplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Light A, Karthikeyan S, Maruthan S, Elhage O, Danuser H, Dasgupta P.
    BJU Int; 2018 Aug; 122(2):181-194. PubMed ID: 29453902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Laparoscopic robotic-assisted management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in patients with horseshoe kidneys: technique and 1-year follow-up.
    Chammas M, Feuillu B, Coissard A, Hubert J.
    BJU Int; 2006 Mar; 97(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 16469030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Population-based comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in paediatric pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
    Knoedler J, Han L, Granberg C, Kramer S, Chow G, Gettman M, Kimball B, Moriarty J, Kim S, Husmann D.
    BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(7):1141-7. PubMed ID: 23510261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned.
    Kutikov A, Nguyen M, Guzzo T, Canter D, Casale P.
    J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2237-9; discussion 2239-40. PubMed ID: 17070302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory Survey.
    Freilich DA, Penna FJ, Nelson CP, Retik AB, Nguyen HT.
    J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):704-8. PubMed ID: 20022046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status.
    Inagaki T, Rha KH, Ong AM, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW.
    BJU Int; 2005 Mar; 95 Suppl 2():102-5. PubMed ID: 15720343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome.
    Singh I, Hemal AK.
    Can J Urol; 2010 Apr; 17(2):5099-108. PubMed ID: 20398449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.