These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

486 related items for PubMed ID: 24486226

  • 1. Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term.
    Wolfe H, Timofeev J, Tefera E, Desale S, Driggers RW.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 211(1):53.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24486226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with a favorable cervix.
    Osmundson SS, Ou-Yang RJ, Grobman WA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 116(3):601-605. PubMed ID: 20733441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix.
    Osmundson S, Ou-Yang RJ, Grobman WA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):583-587. PubMed ID: 21343761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, Scheve EJ.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.
    Kawakita T, Iqbal SN, Huang CC, Reddy UM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 28578171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies.
    Gibson KS, Waters TP, Bailit JL.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 211(3):249.e1-249.e16. PubMed ID: 24631440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
    Souter V, Painter I, Sitcov K, Caughey AB.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Term Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Obese Women and Their Offspring.
    Gibbs Pickens CM, Kramer MR, Howards PP, Badell ML, Caughey AB, Hogue CJ.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 29215512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A risk of waiting: the weekly incidence of hypertensive disorders and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity in low-risk term pregnancies.
    Gibson KS, Waters TP, Bailit JL.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):389.e1-389.e12. PubMed ID: 26440691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
    Grobman WA, Caughey AB.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Miller NR, Cypher RL, Foglia LM, Pates JA, Nielsen PE.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 126(6):1258-1264. PubMed ID: 26551184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
    Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, Cheng YW, Gienger A, Little SE, Lee JF, Wong L, Shaffer BL, Tran SH, Padula A, McDonald KM, Long EF, Owens DK, Bravata DM.
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Outcomes of Term Induction in Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Analysis of a Modern Obstetric Cohort.
    Lappen JR, Hackney DN, Bailit JL.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 126(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 26241264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks.
    Palatnik A, Kominiarek MA.
    Am J Perinatol; 2020 Jun; 37(7):695-707. PubMed ID: 31039597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas.
    Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):698-704. PubMed ID: 15802393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Elective Induction of Labor in the 39th Week of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management of Low-Risk Multiparous Women.
    Sinkey RG, Blanchard CT, Szychowski JM, Ausbeck E, Subramaniam A, Neely CL, Casey BM, Tita AT.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):282-287. PubMed ID: 31306328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Risk factors for cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix at or beyond 41 weeks of gestation.
    Son GH, Kim JH, Kwon JY, Kim YH, Park YW.
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013 Aug; 76(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 24192506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Induction of labor at 41 weeks of pregnancy among primiparas with an unfavorable Bishop score.
    Marroquin GA, Tudorica N, Salafia CM, Hecht R, Mikhail M.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Nov; 288(5):989-93. PubMed ID: 23974279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Darney BG, Snowden JM, Cheng YW, Jacob L, Nicholson JM, Kaimal A, Dublin S, Getahun D, Caughey AB.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 122(4):761-769. PubMed ID: 24084532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
    Melamed N, Ray JG, Geary M, Bedard D, Yang C, Sprague A, Murray-Davis B, Barrett J, Berger H.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):364.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26928149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.