These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


183 related items for PubMed ID: 24495263

  • 1. Accurate diagnosis of small cerebral aneurysms ≤5 mm in diameter with 3.0-T MR angiography.
    Li MH, Li YD, Gu BX, Cheng YS, Wang W, Tan HQ, Chen YC.
    Radiology; 2014 May; 271(2):553-60. PubMed ID: 24495263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Contrast-free MRA at 3.0 T for the detection of intracranial aneurysms.
    Li MH, Li YD, Tan HQ, Gu BX, Chen YC, Wang W, Chen SW, Hu DJ.
    Neurology; 2011 Aug 16; 77(7):667-76. PubMed ID: 21775735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Patients with Good Clinical Grade: Accuracy of 3.0-T MR Angiography for Detection and Characterization.
    Li M, Zhu Y, Song H, Gu B, Lu H, Li Y, Tan H, Cheng Y.
    Radiology; 2017 Jul 16; 284(1):191-199. PubMed ID: 28234561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by flow diverter: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography (3D-TOF-MRA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) sequences with digital subtraction angiography as the gold standard.
    Attali J, Benaissa A, Soize S, Kadziolka K, Portefaix C, Pierot L.
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2016 Jan 16; 8(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 25352582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. CT angiography with three-dimensional techniques for the early diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. Comparison with intra-arterial DSA and the surgical findings.
    Karamessini MT, Kagadis GC, Petsas T, Karnabatidis D, Konstantinou D, Sakellaropoulos GC, Nikiforidis GC, Siablis D.
    Eur J Radiol; 2004 Mar 16; 49(3):212-23. PubMed ID: 14962650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of 3D TOF-MRA and 3D CE-MRA at 3T for imaging of intracranial aneurysms.
    Cirillo M, Scomazzoni F, Cirillo L, Cadioli M, Simionato F, Iadanza A, Kirchin M, Righi C, Anzalone N.
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec 16; 82(12):e853-9. PubMed ID: 24103356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of intracranial aneurysms with high-resolution MR angiography using single-artery highlighting technique: correlation with digital subtraction angiography.
    Li H, Yan L, Li MH, Li YD, Tan HQ, Gu BX, Wang W.
    Radiol Med; 2013 Dec 16; 118(8):1379-87. PubMed ID: 22872463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Diagnostic accuracy of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: influence of aneurysm size.
    Deutschmann HA, Augustin M, Simbrunner J, Unger B, Schoellnast H, Fritz GA, Klein GE.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Apr 16; 28(4):628-34. PubMed ID: 17416811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Boulin A, Pierot L.
    Radiology; 2001 Apr 16; 219(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 11274544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis.
    Nederkoorn PJ, Elgersma OE, van der Graaf Y, Eikelboom BC, Kappelle LJ, Mali WP.
    Radiology; 2003 Sep 16; 228(3):677-82. PubMed ID: 12869686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Coil-treated aneurysms: decision making regarding additional treatment based on findings of MR angiography and intraarterial DSA.
    Schaafsma JD, Velthuis BK, van den Berg R, Brouwer PA, Majoie CB, Barkhof F, Eshghi O, de Kort GA, Lo RT, Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ, Bot JC, Rinkel GJ.
    Radiology; 2012 Dec 16; 265(3):858-63. PubMed ID: 23012464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading.
    Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Castellano R, Strada L, Righi C, Politi LS, Kirchin MA, Chiesa R, Scotti G.
    Radiology; 2005 Jul 16; 236(1):204-13. PubMed ID: 15955853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography of carotid arteries: does steady-state imaging improve accuracy of first-pass imaging? Comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
    Anzidei M, Napoli A, Marincola BC, Nofroni I, Geiger D, Zaccagna F, Catalano C, Passariello R.
    Radiology; 2009 May 16; 251(2):457-66. PubMed ID: 19401574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Renal artery assessment with nonenhanced steady-state free precession versus contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Wyttenbach R, Braghetti A, Wyss M, Alerci M, Briner L, Santini P, Cozzi L, Di Valentino M, Katoh M, Marone C, Vock P, Gallino A.
    Radiology; 2007 Oct 16; 245(1):186-95. PubMed ID: 17717326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.