These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

340 related items for PubMed ID: 24500787

  • 1. The OPTI-MIND study: a prospective, observational study of pacemaker patients according to pacing modality and primary indications.
    Biffi M, Melissano D, Rossi P, Kaliska G, Havliĉek A, Pelargonio G, Romero R, Guastaferro C, Menichelli M, Vireca E, Frisoni J, Boriani G, Malacky T.
    Europace; 2014 May; 16(5):689-97. PubMed ID: 24500787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Reduction of unnecessary right ventricular pacing by managed ventricular pacing and search AV+ algorithms in pacemaker patients: 12-month follow-up results of a randomized study.
    Chen S, Chen K, Tao Q, Zheng L, Shen F, Wu S, Fan J, Xu G, Wang L, Zhou X, Zhang S, COMPARE Study Investigators.
    Europace; 2014 Nov; 16(11):1595-602. PubMed ID: 24706091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Safety and efficiency of ventricular pacing prevention with an AAI-DDD changeover mode in patients with sinus node disease or atrioventricular block: impact on battery longevity-a sub-study of the ANSWER trial.
    Stockburger M, Defaye P, Boveda S, Stancak B, Lazarus A, Sipötz J, Nardi S, Rolando M, Moreno J.
    Europace; 2016 May; 18(5):739-46. PubMed ID: 26612882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The relationship between right ventricular pacing and atrial fibrillation burden and disease progression in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the long-MinVPACE study.
    Veasey RA, Arya A, Silberbauer J, Sharma V, Lloyd GW, Patel NR, Sulke AN.
    Europace; 2011 Jun; 13(6):815-20. PubMed ID: 21208945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of AAIR versus DDDR pacing for patients with sinus node dysfunction: a long-term follow-up study.
    Mutagaywa RK, Tumaini B, Chin A.
    Cardiovasc J Afr; 2011 Jun; 32(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 32946543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Atrial pacing site and atrioventricular conduction in patients paced for sinus node disease.
    Watabe T, Abe H, Kohno R, Oginosawa Y, Hayashi K, Ohe H, Tamura M, Takeuchi M, Otsuji Y.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1224-31. PubMed ID: 24946835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Minimizing right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node disease and prolonged PQ interval: The impact on exercise capacity.
    Krzyżanowski K, Michałkiewicz D, Orski Z, Wierzbowski R, Ryczek R, Cwetsch A.
    Cardiol J; 2015 Nov; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 24846513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction through programming a long atrioventricular delay along with the DDIR mode.
    Nitardy A, Langreck H, Dietz R, Stockburger M.
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2009 Jan; 98(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18853096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The PhysioVP-AF study, a randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical benefit of physiological ventricular pacing vs. managed ventricular pacing for persistent atrial fibrillation prevention in patients with prolonged atrioventricular conduction: design and rationale.
    Pastore G, Bertini M, Bonanno C, Coluccia G, Dell'Era G, De Mattia L, Grieco D, Katsouras G, Maines M, Marcantoni L, Marinaccio L, Paglino G, Palmisano P, Ziacchi M, Zoppo F, Noventa F.
    Europace; 2023 May 19; 25(5):. PubMed ID: 36974970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Retrospective analysis of 1650 permanent pacemaker implantations experience over two different consecutive time periods in a single cardiology clinic].
    Bayata S, Yeşil M, Arikan E, Postaci N, Berilğen R, Ceylan O, Avci E.
    Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2010 Apr 19; 10(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 20382611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Long-term progression of rhythm and conduction disturbances in pacemaker recipients: findings from the Pacemaker Expert Programming study.
    Palmisano P, Ziacchi M, Ammendola E, Dell'Era G, Guerra F, Aspromonte V, Boriani G, Nigro G, Occhetta E, Capucci A, Ricci RP, Maglia G, Biffi M, Accogli M, Italian Association of Arrhythmology, Cardiac Pacing (AIAC).
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2018 Jul 19; 19(7):357-365. PubMed ID: 29846304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Increased base rate of atrial pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation after implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker: insights from the Atrial Overdrive Pacing Study.
    Kantharia BK, Freedman RA, Hoekenga D, Tomassoni G, Worley S, Sorrentino R, Steinhaus D, Wolkowicz JM, Syed ZA, AOP Study Investigators.
    Europace; 2007 Nov 19; 9(11):1024-30. PubMed ID: 17913697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.