These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

972 related items for PubMed ID: 24504128

  • 21. Canadian Glaucoma Study: 3. Impact of risk factors and intraocular pressure reduction on the rates of visual field change.
    Chauhan BC, Mikelberg FS, Artes PH, Balazsi AG, LeBlanc RP, Lesk MR, Nicolela MT, Trope GE, Canadian Glaucoma Study Group.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 128(10):1249-55. PubMed ID: 20696979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Noninvasive transorbital alternating current stimulation improves subjective visual functioning and vision-related quality of life in optic neuropathy.
    Gall C, Sgorzaly S, Schmidt S, Brandt S, Fedorov A, Sabel BA.
    Brain Stimul; 2011 Oct; 4(4):175-88. PubMed ID: 21981853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Capturing the benefit of vision restoration therapy.
    Glisson CC.
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 17(6):504-8. PubMed ID: 17065916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Efficacy of vision restoration therapy after optic neuritis (VISION study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Schinzel J, Schwarzlose L, Dietze H, Bartusch K, Weiss S, Ohlraun S, Paul F, Dörr J.
    Trials; 2012 Jun 28; 13():94. PubMed ID: 22742888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Risk factors for visual field progression in the low-pressure glaucoma treatment study.
    De Moraes CG, Liebmann JM, Greenfield DS, Gardiner SK, Ritch R, Krupin T, Low-pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study Group.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Oct 28; 154(4):702-11. PubMed ID: 22835512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Incidence and rates of visual field progression after longitudinally measured optic disc change in glaucoma.
    Chauhan BC, Nicolela MT, Artes PH.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Nov 28; 116(11):2110-8. PubMed ID: 19500850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The Low-pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study (LoGTS) study design and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients.
    Krupin T, Liebmann JM, Greenfield DS, Rosenberg LF, Ritch R, Yang JW, Low-Pressure Glaucoma Study Group.
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Mar 28; 112(3):376-85. PubMed ID: 15745762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Restoration of vision II: residual functions and training-induced visual field enlargement in brain-damaged patients.
    Kasten E, Poggel DA, Müller-Oehring E, Gothe J, Schulte T, Sabel BA.
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 1999 Mar 28; 15(2-3):273-87. PubMed ID: 12671238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Vision- and health-related quality of life before and after vision restoration training in cerebrally damaged patients.
    Gall C, Mueller I, Gudlin J, Lindig A, Schlueter D, Jobke S, Franke GH, Sabel BA.
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2008 Mar 28; 26(4-5):341-53. PubMed ID: 18997310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Effect of doxycycline vs placebo on retinal function and diabetic retinopathy progression in patients with severe nonproliferative or non-high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Scott IU, Jackson GR, Quillen DA, Larsen M, Klein R, Liao J, Holfort S, Munch IC, Gardner TW.
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 May 28; 132(5):535-43. PubMed ID: 24604308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Reading performance after vision rehabilitation of subjects with homonymous visual field defects.
    Gall C, Sabel BA.
    PM R; 2012 Dec 28; 4(12):928-35. PubMed ID: 23122896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Inverse stimuli in perimetric performance reveal larger visual field defects: implications for vision restoration.
    Kasten E, Guenther T, Sabel BA.
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2008 Dec 28; 26(4-5):355-64. PubMed ID: 18997311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Attentional cueing improves vision restoration therapy in patients with visual field defects.
    Poggel DA, Kasten E, Sabel BA.
    Neurology; 2004 Dec 14; 63(11):2069-76. PubMed ID: 15596752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 49.