These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
493 related items for PubMed ID: 24533499
21. Calibration and Validation of a Wrist- and Hip-Worn Actigraph Accelerometer in 4-Year-Old Children. Johansson E, Larisch LM, Marcus C, Hagströmer M. PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162436. PubMed ID: 27617962 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Feasibility and validity of accelerometer measurements to assess physical activity in toddlers. Van Cauwenberghe E, Gubbels J, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Cardon G. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2011 Jun 26; 8():67. PubMed ID: 21703004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Calibration of GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points for the assessment of physical activity intensity of preschool aged children. Roscoe CMP, James RS, Duncan MJ. Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Aug 26; 176(8):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 28674825 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Redenius N, Kim Y, Byun W. BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb 07; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 30732582 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Calibration of the GENEA accelerometer for assessment of physical activity intensity in children. Phillips LR, Parfitt G, Rowlands AV. J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Mar 07; 16(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 22770768 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Examination of different accelerometer cut-points for assessing sedentary behaviors in children. Kim Y, Lee JM, Peters BP, Gaesser GA, Welk GJ. PLoS One; 2014 Mar 07; 9(4):e90630. PubMed ID: 24699259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Calibration of hip accelerometers for measuring physical activity and sedentary behaviours in adults with Down syndrome. Agiovlasitis S, Ballenger BK, Schultz EE, Du Q, Motl RW. J Intellect Disabil Res; 2023 Feb 07; 67(2):172-181. PubMed ID: 36514268 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Classification of physical activity intensities using a wrist-worn accelerometer in 8-12-year-old children. Chandler JL, Brazendale K, Beets MW, Mealing BA. Pediatr Obes; 2016 Apr 07; 11(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 25893950 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. New validated thresholds for various intensities of physical activity in adolescents using the Actigraph accelerometer. Vanhelst J, Béghin L, Turck D, Gottrand F. Int J Rehabil Res; 2011 Jun 07; 34(2):175-7. PubMed ID: 20890210 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Validating accelerometry as a measure of physical activity and energy expenditure in chronic stroke. Serra MC, Balraj E, DiSanzo BL, Ivey FM, Hafer-Macko CE, Treuth MS, Ryan AS. Top Stroke Rehabil; 2017 Jan 07; 24(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 27322733 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Calibration and validation of physical behaviour cut-points using wrist-worn ActiGraphs for children and adolescents: A systematic review. Clanchy K, Stanfield M, Smits E, Liimatainen J, Ritchie C. J Sci Med Sport; 2024 Feb 07; 27(2):92-104. PubMed ID: 38087661 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Validity of the ActiGraph GT1M during walking and cycling. Herman Hansen B, Børtnes I, Hildebrand M, Holme I, Kolle E, Anderssen SA. J Sports Sci; 2014 Feb 07; 32(6):510-6. PubMed ID: 24117333 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Wrist Accelerometer Cut Points for Classifying Sedentary Behavior in Children. VAN Loo CM, Okely AD, Batterham MJ, Hinkley T, Ekelund U, Brage S, Reilly JJ, Trost SG, Jones RA, Janssen X, Cliff DP. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Apr 07; 49(4):813-822. PubMed ID: 27851669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer. Esliger DW, Rowlands AV, Hurst TL, Catt M, Murray P, Eston RG. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Jun 07; 43(6):1085-93. PubMed ID: 21088628 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults. Montoye AHK, Clevenger KA, Pfeiffer KA, Nelson MB, Bock JM, Imboden MT, Kaminsky LA. J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov 07; 38(22):2569-2578. PubMed ID: 32677510 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Everything you wanted to know about selecting the "right" Actigraph accelerometer cut-points for youth, but…: a systematic review. Kim Y, Beets MW, Welk GJ. J Sci Med Sport; 2012 Jul 07; 15(4):311-21. PubMed ID: 22306372 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of two ActiGraph accelerometer generations in the assessment of physical activity in free living conditions. Vanhelst J, Mikulovic J, Bui-Xuan G, Dieu O, Blondeau T, Fardy P, Béghin L. BMC Res Notes; 2012 Apr 25; 5():187. PubMed ID: 22534207 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Actigraph accelerometer interinstrument reliability during free-living in adults. McClain JJ, Sisson SB, Tudor-Locke C. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Sep 25; 39(9):1509-14. PubMed ID: 17805082 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Actigraph GT3X: validation and determination of physical activity intensity cut points. Santos-Lozano A, Santín-Medeiros F, Cardon G, Torres-Luque G, Bailón R, Bergmeir C, Ruiz JR, Lucia A, Garatachea N. Int J Sports Med; 2013 Nov 25; 34(11):975-82. PubMed ID: 23700330 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Establishing wrist-based cutpoints for the Actical accelerometer in elementary school-aged children. Schaefer CA, Nace H, Browning R. J Phys Act Health; 2014 Mar 25; 11(3):604-13. PubMed ID: 23493290 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]