These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

587 related items for PubMed ID: 24559463

  • 21. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level anterior discectomy and a one-level corpectomy, combined with fusion and anterior plate reconstruction in the cervical spine.
    Aghayev K, Doulgeris JJ, Gonzalez-Blohm SA, Eleraky M, Lee WE, Vrionis FD.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2014 Jan; 29(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 24239024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization.
    Miyanji F, Mahar A, Oka R, Newton P.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov 01; 33(23):E865-9. PubMed ID: 18978579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
    Singh K, Vaccaro AR, Kim J, Lorenz EP, Lim TH, An HS.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct 15; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy: a biomechanical study.
    Singh K, Vaccaro AR, Kim J, Lorenz EP, Lim TH, An HS.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr 15; 29(8):845-9. PubMed ID: 15082982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Biomechanical comparison of transfacet screws to lateral mass screw-rod constructs in the lower cervical spine.
    Tong J, Ji W, Zhou R, Huang Z, Liu S, Zhu Q.
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jun 15; 25(6):1787-93. PubMed ID: 26530298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Biomechanical analysis of disc pressure and facet contact force after simulated two-level cervical surgeries (fusion and arthroplasty) and hybrid surgery.
    Park J, Shin JJ, Lim J.
    World Neurosurg; 2014 Dec 15; 82(6):1388-93. PubMed ID: 24937596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Plate fixation in the cervical spine: traditional paramedian screw configuration compared with unique unilateral configuration.
    Mageswaran P, McLain RF, Colbrunn R, Bonner T, Hothem E, Bartsch A.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jun 15; 18(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 23600582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Kretzer RM, Hu N, Umekoji H, Sciubba DM, Jallo GI, McAfee PC, Tortolani PJ, Cunningham BW.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Oct 15; 13(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 20887140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Corpectomy versus discectomy for the treatment of multilevel cervical spine pathology: a finite element model analysis.
    Hussain M, Nassr A, Natarajan RN, An HS, Andersson GB.
    Spine J; 2012 May 15; 12(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 22572585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. In vitro biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus translaminar C-2 screw fixation in C2-3 instrumentation.
    Reddy C, Ingalhalikar AV, Channon S, Lim TH, Torner J, Hitchon PW.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Oct 15; 7(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 17933316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. A biomechanical comparison of three surgical approaches in bilateral subaxial cervical facet dislocation.
    Kim SM, Lim TJ, Paterno J, Park J, Kim DH.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Jul 15; 1(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 15291030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Biomechanical comparison of instrumented and uninstrumented multilevel cervical discectomy versus corpectomy.
    Galler RM, Dogan S, Fifield MS, Bozkus H, Chamberlain RH, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May 15; 32(11):1220-6. PubMed ID: 17495779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC.
    Spine J; 2010 Apr 15; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Biomechanics of adjacent segments after a multilevel cervical corpectomy using anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior instrumentation techniques: a finite element model study.
    Hussain M, Nassr A, Natarajan RN, An HS, Andersson GB.
    Spine J; 2013 Jun 15; 13(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 23578989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Biomechanical consequences of cervical spondylectomy versus corpectomy.
    Doğan S, Baek S, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR.
    Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct 15; 63(4 Suppl 2):303-8; discussion 308. PubMed ID: 18981835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Cervical facet force analysis after disc replacement versus fusion.
    Patel VV, Wuthrich ZR, McGilvray KC, Lafleur MC, Lindley EM, Sun D, Puttlitz CM.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2017 May 15; 44():52-58. PubMed ID: 28340364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Biomechanical testing of posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques.
    Melcher RP, Puttlitz CM, Kleinstueck FS, Lotz JC, Harms J, Bradford DS.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov 15; 27(22):2435-40. PubMed ID: 12435971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.