These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

112 related items for PubMed ID: 24565401

  • 1. Propensity score matching analysis of mechanical versus bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacements.
    Hwang HY, Kim KH, Kim KB, Ahn H.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Apr; 97(4):1294-9. PubMed ID: 24565401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Mechanical tricuspid valve replacement is not superior in patients younger than 65 years who need long-term anticoagulation.
    Hwang HY, Kim KH, Kim KB, Ahn H.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Apr; 93(4):1154-60. PubMed ID: 22365259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Fifteen-Year Outcomes After Bioprosthetic and Mechanical Tricuspid Valve Replacement.
    Kang Y, Hwang HY, Sohn SH, Choi JW, Kim KH, Kim KB.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2020 Nov; 110(5):1564-1571. PubMed ID: 32224239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Long-term clinical results of tricuspid valve replacement.
    Chang BC, Lim SH, Yi G, Hong YS, Lee S, Yoo KJ, Kang MS, Cho BK.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Apr; 81(4):1317-23, discussion 1323-4. PubMed ID: 16564264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Treatment for severe functional tricuspid regurgitation: annuloplasty versus valve replacement.
    Hwang HY, Kim KH, Kim KB, Ahn H.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Aug; 46(2):e21-7. PubMed ID: 24917649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Tricuspid valve replacement: bioprostheses are preferable.
    Dalrymple-Hay MJ, Leung Y, Ohri SK, Haw MP, Ross JK, Livesey SA, Monro JL.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 10616242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Long term results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses in the tricuspid valve position: which valve types are better--mechanical or biological prostheses?
    Songur CM, Simsek E, Ozen A, Kocabeyoglu S, Donmez TA.
    Heart Lung Circ; 2014 Dec; 23(12):1175-8. PubMed ID: 25153357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Long-term outcomes of isolated mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in different age groups of propensity-matched patients.
    Rokui S, Gottschalk B, Peng D, Groenewoud R, Ye J.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2024 Jul 01; 66(1):. PubMed ID: 38936344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Long-Term Outcomes of Bioprosthetic and Mechanical Tricuspid Valve Replacement after Left-Sided Valves Surgery.
    Yuan Y, Sun Y, Li N, Han L, Lu F, Li B, Xu Z.
    Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Dec 20; 29(6):307-314. PubMed ID: 37380474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.