These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

479 related items for PubMed ID: 24595388

  • 1. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: a pointwise linear regression analysis.
    Liu S, Yu M, Weinreb RN, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May 02; 55(5):2862-9. PubMed ID: 24595388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
    Liu S, Yu M, Weinreb RN, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK.
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan 02; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Visual field progression with frequency-doubling matrix perimetry and standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in healthy controls.
    Redmond T, O'Leary N, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, Artes PH, Chauhan BC.
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec 02; 131(12):1565-72. PubMed ID: 24177807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul 02; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Glaucoma progression detection with frequency doubling technology (FDT) compared to standard automated perimetry (SAP) in the Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study.
    Wesselink C, Jansonius NM.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Sep 02; 37(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 28836391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
    Haymes SA, Hutchison DM, McCormick TA, Varma DK, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb 02; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S, Lam S, Weinreb RN, Ye C, Cheung CY, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep 21; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of Standard Automated Perimetry, Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry, and Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry to Monitor Glaucoma Progression.
    Hu R, Wang C, Gu Y, Racette L.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Feb 21; 95(7):e2618. PubMed ID: 26886602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N, Giangiacomo A, Fontana H, Hoffman D, Caprioli J.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb 21; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI, Goldberg I, Healey PR, Graham S.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May 21; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.
    Artes PH, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec 21; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B, Demirel S, Zhang X, Hood DC, Patterson E, Jamil A, Mansberger SL, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar 21; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA, Bosworth CF, Blumenthal EZ, Girkin C, Weinreb RN.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun 21; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of matrix frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in monitoring the development of visual field defects for glaucoma suspect eyes.
    Hu R, Wang C, Racette L.
    PLoS One; 2017 Jun 21; 12(5):e0178079. PubMed ID: 28542536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Predicting conversion to glaucoma using standard automated perimetry and frequency doubling technology.
    Takahashi G, Demirel S, Johnson CA.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr 21; 255(4):797-803. PubMed ID: 28110356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb 21; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N, Giaconi JA, Manassakorn A, Hoffman D, Caprioli J.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May 21; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Usefulness of frequency-doubling technology for perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss.
    Fan X, Wu LL, Ma ZZ, Xiao GG, Liu F.
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug 21; 117(8):1530-7, 1537.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20466428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma.
    Smith SD, Katz J, Quigley HA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jun 21; 37(7):1419-28. PubMed ID: 8641844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Global and pointwise rates of decay in glaucoma eyes deteriorating according to pointwise event analysis.
    Nassiri N, Moghimi S, Coleman AL, Law SK, Caprioli J, Nouri-Mahdavi K.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Feb 01; 54(2):1208-13. PubMed ID: 23329667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.