These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Comparison of Twin-block and Dynamax appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusion in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. Thiruvenkatachari B, Sandler J, Murray A, Walsh T, O'Brien K. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):144.e1-9; discussion 144-5. PubMed ID: 20691354 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Class II Division I Treated with Twin Block Appliance: A Case Report. Patel P, Shanthraj R, Garg N, Vallakati A. Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010 Aug; 28(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 29990395 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of skeletal 2 malocclusion using bone-plate anchorage. A case report. Kraikosol K, Rattanayatikul C, Godfrey K, Vattraphudej T. Aust Orthod J; 2007 May; 23(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 17679538 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance. Lau EY, Sampson WJ, Townsend GC, Hughes T. Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Orthopedic and orthodontic effects of Twin-block appliance. Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2005 May; 29(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 15926439 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-phase treatment of an Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion. Rapaport M. Aust Orthod J; 1998 Mar; 15(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 9590927 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes. Gill DS, Lee RT. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):465-72; quiz 517. PubMed ID: 15821691 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]