These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

172 related items for PubMed ID: 24604393

  • 21. Teacher report and direct assessment of preferences for identifying reinforcers for young children.
    Cote CA, Thompson RH, Hanley GP, McKerchar PM.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 17471799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparison of edible and leisure reinforcers.
    Fahmie TA, Iwata BA, Jann KE.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):331-43. PubMed ID: 25891170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Functional analysis and treatment of elopement.
    Piazza CC, Hanley GP, Bowman LG, Ruyter JM, Lindauer SE, Saiontz DM.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(4):653-72. PubMed ID: 9433790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. A comparison between traditional economical and demand curve analyses of relative reinforcer efficacy in the validation of preference assessment predictions.
    Reed DD, Luiselli JK, Magnuson JD, Fillers S, Vieira S, Rue HC.
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2009 Jun; 12(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 19466625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The effects of establishing operations on preferences for tangible items.
    McAdam DB, Klatt KP, Koffarnus M, Dicesare A, Solberg K, Welch C, Murphy S.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005 Jun; 38(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 15898479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. An Investigation of a Video-Based Preference Assessment of Social Interactions.
    Wolfe K, Kunnavatana SS, Shoemaker AM.
    Behav Modif; 2018 Sep; 42(5):729-746. PubMed ID: 28911243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Effects of increased response effort and reinforcer delay on choice and aberrant behavior.
    Gwinn MM, Derby KM, Fisher W, Kurtz P, Fahs A, Augustine M, McLaughlin TF.
    Behav Modif; 2005 Jul; 29(4):642-52. PubMed ID: 15911686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Using videos to assess preference for novel stimuli in children with autism.
    Brodhead MT, Rispoli MJ.
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2017 Nov; 20(8):560-564. PubMed ID: 27739912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Reinforcer assessment for children with developmental disabilities and visual impairments.
    Paclawskyj TR, Vollmer TR.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995 Nov; 28(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 7541398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Assessment and treatment of aggressive behavior without a clear social function.
    Ringdahl JE, Call NA, Mews JB, Boelter EW, Christensen TJ.
    Res Dev Disabil; 2008 Nov; 29(4):351-62. PubMed ID: 17646083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures.
    DeLeon IG, Iwata BA, Conners J, Wallace MD.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999 Nov; 32(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 10201108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Assessing preferences of individuals with acquired brain injury using alternative stimulus modalities.
    Heinicke MR, Carr JE, Eastridge D, Kupfer J, Mozzoni MP.
    Brain Inj; 2013 Nov; 27(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 23252436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.