These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

172 related items for PubMed ID: 24604393

  • 41. Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification.
    Fisher WW, Piazza CC, Bowman LG, Amari A.
    Am J Ment Retard; 1996 Jul; 101(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 8827248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Stability of preference and reinforcing efficacy of edible, leisure, and social attention stimuli.
    Butler C, Graff RB.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Apr; 54(2):684-699. PubMed ID: 33469909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Examination of an antecedent communication intervention to reduce tangibly maintained challenging behavior: a controlled analog analysis.
    O'Reilly M, Fragale C, Gainey S, Kang S, Koch H, Shubert J, Zein FE, Longino D, Chung M, Xu Z, White P, Lang R, Davis T, Rispoli M, Lancioni G, Didden R, Healy O, Kagohara D, van der Meer L, Sigafoos J.
    Res Dev Disabil; 2012 Apr; 33(5):1462-8. PubMed ID: 22543058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Are video-based preference assessments without access to selected stimuli effective?
    Clark DR, Donaldson JM, Kahng S.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Dec; 48(4):895-900. PubMed ID: 26333156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. An application of the matching law to severe problem behavior.
    Borrero JC, Vollmer TR.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002 Dec; 35(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 11936543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. A comparison of verbal and tangible stimulus preference assessments.
    Cohen-Almeida D, Graff RB, Ahearn WH.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000 Dec; 33(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 11051576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures.
    Northup J, George T, Jones K, Broussard C, Vollmer TR.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996 Dec; 29(2):201-12. PubMed ID: 8682736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.