These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

172 related items for PubMed ID: 24604393

  • 61. Elimination of position-biased responding in individuals with autism and intellectual disabilities.
    Bourret JC, Iwata BA, Harper JM, North ST.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(2):241-50. PubMed ID: 22844134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 62. Predicting the relative efficacy of three presentation methods for assessing preferences of persons with developmental disabilities.
    Conyers C, Doole A, Vause T, Harapiak S, Yu DC, Martin GL.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 11936545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 63. The effects of pairing non-preferred staff with preferred stimuli on increasing the reinforcing value of non-preferred staff attention.
    Jerome J, Sturmey P.
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Apr; 35(4):849-60. PubMed ID: 24508066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 64. Correspondence between traditional models of functional analysis and a functional analysis of manding behavior.
    LaRue RH, Sloman KN, Weiss MJ, Delmolino L, Hansford A, Szalony J, Madigan R, Lambright NM.
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011 Apr; 32(6):2449-57. PubMed ID: 21821393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 65. Comparison of the predictive validity and consistency among preference assessment procedures: a review of the literature.
    Kang S, O'Reilly M, Lancioni G, Falcomata TS, Sigafoos J, Xu Z.
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Apr; 34(4):1125-33. PubMed ID: 23357675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 66.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 67. Effects of subject- versus experimenter-selected reinforcers on the behavior of individuals with profound developmental disabilities.
    Smith RG, Iwata BA, Shore BA.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995 Apr; 28(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 7706151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 68. A comparison of preference-assessment methods.
    Verriden AL, Roscoe EM.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Jun; 49(2):265-85. PubMed ID: 27037669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 69. Infrequent, but not frequent, reinforcers produce more variable responding and deficient sustained attention in young children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Aase H, Sagvolden T.
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2006 May; 47(5):457-71. PubMed ID: 16671929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 70. Web-based stimulus preference assessment and reinforcer assessment for videos.
    Curiel H, Poling A.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 Jul; 52(3):796-803. PubMed ID: 31219192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 71. An evaluation of the effects of access duration on preference assessment outcomes.
    Jones BA, Dozier CL, Neidert PL.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014 Jul; 47(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 24535847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 72. Functions of maladaptive behavior in intellectual and developmental disabilities: behavior categories and topographies.
    Rojahn J, Zaja RH, Turygin N, Moore L, van Ingen DJ.
    Res Dev Disabil; 2012 Jul; 33(6):2020-7. PubMed ID: 22750358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 73. A method for evaluating parameters of reinforcement during parent-child interactions.
    Borrero CS, Vollmer TR, Borrero JC, Bourret J.
    Res Dev Disabil; 2005 Jul; 26(6):577-92. PubMed ID: 16303585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 74.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 75.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 76. A comparison of picture and GIF-based preference assessments for social interaction.
    Morris SL, Vollmer TR.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jul; 53(3):1452-1465. PubMed ID: 31965577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 77. Using a self-control training procedure to increase appropriate behavior.
    Dixon MR, Hayes LJ, Binder LM, Manthey S, Sigman C, Zdanowski DM.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998 Jul; 31(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 9652100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 78. Examination of efficacious, efficient, and socially valid error-correction procedures to teach sight words and prepositions to children with autism spectrum disorder.
    Kodak T, Campbell V, Bergmann S, LeBlanc B, Kurtz-Nelson E, Cariveau T, Haq S, Zemantic P, Mahon J.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):532-47. PubMed ID: 27150389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 79. Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.
    Pace GM, Ivancic MT, Edwards GL, Iwata BA, Page TJ.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1985 Sep; 18(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 4044458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 80. An analysis of choice making in the assessment of young children with severe behavior problems.
    Harding JW, Wacker DP, Berg WK, Cooper LJ, Asmus J, Mlela K, Muller J.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999 Sep; 32(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 10201104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.