These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

179 related items for PubMed ID: 24606308

  • 1. Susceptibility to interference by music and speech maskers in middle-aged adults.
    Başkent D, van Engelshoven S, Galvin JJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):EL147-53. PubMed ID: 24606308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Speech perception with music maskers by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Eskridge EN, Galvin JJ, Aronoff JM, Li T, Fu QJ.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):800-10. PubMed ID: 22223890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S, Kollmeier B, Brand T, Jürgens T.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A, Buchholz JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception.
    Helfer KS, Freyman RL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):748-59. PubMed ID: 25096109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Masking effects of speech and music: does the masker's hierarchical structure matter?
    Shi LF, Law Y.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Apr; 49(4):296-308. PubMed ID: 20151877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA, Fidan D, Türkyılmaz D, Hochmuth S, Ergenç İ, Sennaroğlu G, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Apr; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
    Gustafson SJ, Pittman AL.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Automated Measurement of Speech Recognition, Reaction Time, and Speech Rate and Their Relation to Self-Reported Listening Effort for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using various Maskers.
    Holube I, Taesler S, Ibelings S, Hansen M, Ooster J.
    Trends Hear; 2024 Jan; 28():23312165241276435. PubMed ID: 39311635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
    Christiansen C, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
    Francart T, van Wieringen A, Wouters J.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    D'Aquila LA, Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Jan; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Acceptable range of speech level in noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons.
    Sato H, Morimoto M, Ota R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1411-9. PubMed ID: 21895082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S, Jürgens T, Brand T, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Sep; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.