These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


273 related items for PubMed ID: 24608182

  • 1. Single-incision versus standard multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of experimental and observational studies.
    Tamini N, Rota M, Bolzonaro E, Nespoli L, Nespoli A, Valsecchi MG, Gianotti L.
    Surg Innov; 2014 Oct; 21(5):528-45. PubMed ID: 24608182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated gallbladder disease: a meta-analysis.
    Hao L, Liu M, Zhu H, Li Z.
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2012 Dec; 22(6):487-97. PubMed ID: 23238374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis].
    Zhang ZD, Guo WK.
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 51(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 23895750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, DeNoto G, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Paraskeva P, Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Shah S.
    J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Jun; 216(6):1037-47; discussion 1047-8. PubMed ID: 23619321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Wu XS, Shi LB, Gu J, Dong P, Lu JH, Li ML, Mu JS, Wu WG, Yang JH, Ding QC, Zhang L, Liu YB.
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2013 Mar; 23(3):183-91. PubMed ID: 23234334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis.
    Wang Z, Huang X, Zheng Q.
    ANZ J Surg; 2012 Dec; 82(12):885-9. PubMed ID: 23009184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments: early experience in comparison with the gold standard.
    Philipp SR, Miedema BW, Thaler K.
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Nov; 209(5):632-7. PubMed ID: 19854405
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Coagulation and fibrinolysis activation after single-incision versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-center prospective case-controlled pilot study.
    Zezos P, Christoforidou A, Kouklakis G, Tsalikidis C, Dimakis C, Laftsidis P, Virgiliou A, Simopoulos C, Pitiakoudis M.
    Surg Innov; 2014 Feb; 21(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 23575915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Interim report: a randomized controlled trial comparing postoperative pain in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Chang SK, Wang YL, Shen L, Iyer SG, Shaik AB, Lomanto D.
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2013 Feb; 6(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 22979900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Lee PC, Lo C, Lai PS, Chang JJ, Huang SJ, Lin MT, Lee PH.
    Br J Surg; 2010 Jul; 97(7):1007-12. PubMed ID: 20632264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does it work? A systematic review.
    Lirici MM, Tierno SM, Ponzano C.
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4389-99. PubMed ID: 26895901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis.
    Haueter R, Schütz T, Raptis DA, Clavien PA, Zuber M.
    Br J Surg; 2017 Aug; 104(9):1141-1159. PubMed ID: 28569406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Evers L, Bouvy N, Branje D, Peeters A.
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Sep; 31(9):3437-3448. PubMed ID: 28039641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Single-incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a multicenter, case-controlled comparison.
    Champagne BJ, Papaconstantinou HT, Parmar SS, Nagle DA, Young-Fadok TM, Lee EC, Delaney CP.
    Ann Surg; 2012 Jan; 255(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 22104563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison study of clinical outcomes between single-site robotic cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Su WL, Huang JW, Wang SN, Lee KT.
    Asian J Surg; 2017 Nov; 40(6):424-428. PubMed ID: 27188234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Long-term incisional hernia rate after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is significantly higher than that after standard three-port laparoscopy: a cohort study.
    Hoyuela C, Juvany M, Guillaumes S, Ardid J, Trias M, Bachero I, Martrat A.
    Hernia; 2019 Dec; 23(6):1205-1213. PubMed ID: 31073959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory setting.
    Qu JW, Xin C, Wang GY, Yuan ZQ, Li KW.
    Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2019 Jun; 18(3):273-277. PubMed ID: 31056482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Single incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: up-dated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Milas M, Deveđija S, Trkulja V.
    Surgeon; 2014 Oct; 12(5):271-89. PubMed ID: 24529791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.