These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


268 related items for PubMed ID: 24611217

  • 1. A review of implant abutments--abutment classification to aid prosthetic selection.
    Karunagaran S, Paprocki GJ, Wicks R, Markose S.
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2013; 93(2):18-23; quiz 23-4. PubMed ID: 24611217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A systematic approach to definitive planning and designing single and multiple unit implant abutments.
    Karunagaran S, Markose S, Paprocki G, Wicks R.
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):639-48. PubMed ID: 24916855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Virtual-designed and computer-milled implant abutments.
    Priest G.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9 Suppl 2):22-32. PubMed ID: 16125013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The role of the implant impression in abutment selection: a technical note.
    Kupeyan HK, Lang BR.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995 Sep; 10(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 7672844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-supported restoration.
    Grossmann Y, Pasciuta M, Finger IM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 16543025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Fabricating a nonrotational angulated abutment for a single-tooth prosthesis.
    Reid PE, Zinner ID, Bhagat D.
    Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):486-91. PubMed ID: 20009602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A technique for verifying implant analog positions in the definitive cast.
    Sadid-Zadeh R, O'Neal SJ, Liu PR, Aponte-Wesson R.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 23522369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
    Kano SC, Binon PP, Curtis DA.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Mar; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Use of CAD/CAM to fabricate duplicate abutments for retrofitting an existing implant prosthesis: a clinical report.
    Kim C, Kim JY, Lim YJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):429-33. PubMed ID: 24725613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Computer-generated abutments using a coded healing abutment: a two year preliminary report.
    Vafiadis DC.
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 19(7):443-8. PubMed ID: 17929687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Deformation of implant abutments after framework connection using strain gauges.
    Hollweg H, Jacques LB, da Silva Moura M, Bianco VC, Souza EA, Rubo JH.
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 22568468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Tolerance measurements of various implant components.
    Ma T, Nicholls JI, Rubenstein JE.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997 Apr; 12(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 9197102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Digitally enhanced dentistry: the power of digital design.
    Guichet D.
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Mar; 43(3):135-41. PubMed ID: 25864301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Digital design of patient-specific abutments for the retention of implant-retained facial prostheses.
    Kincade C, McHutchion L, Wolfaardt J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):309-312. PubMed ID: 29526301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The "first implant": protocol for the GP, Part 3.
    Tischler M, Ganz SD.
    Dent Today; 2011 Dec; 30(12):64, 66, 68-9. PubMed ID: 22324106
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS, Raigrodski AJ, Flinn BD, Rubenstein JE, Chung KH, Mancl LA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Selecting the best abutment for a single implant.
    Christensen GJ.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Apr; 139(4):484-7. PubMed ID: 18385033
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Simplified fabrication of an implant-supported framework with luted abutment cylinders.
    Stumpel LJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 28024820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
    Sailer I, Sailer T, Stawarczyk B, Jung RE, Hämmerle CH.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Jul; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Utilization of digital technologies for fabrication of definitive implant-supported restorations.
    Ramsey CD, Ritter RG.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Oct; 24(5):299-308. PubMed ID: 23025311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.