These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

262 related items for PubMed ID: 24614020

  • 1. Factors that increase reactivity during fetal nonstress testing.
    Esin S.
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 26(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 24614020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of the manual stimulation test and the nonstress test: a randomized controlled trial.
    Piyamongkol W, Trungtawatchai S, Chanprapaph P, Tongsong T.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Dec; 89(12):1999-2002. PubMed ID: 17214048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical study on detecting false non-reactive of non-stress test by improved acoustic stimulation.
    Xi Q, Du J, Liu X, Shao L.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 20677022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of halogen light in fetal stimulation for fetal well-being assessment.
    Thanaboonyawat I, Wataganara T, Boriboonhiransarn D, Viboonchart S, Tontisirin P.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Sep; 89(9):1376-80. PubMed ID: 17100372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Continuing experience with the fetal acoustic stimulation test.
    Smith CV, Phelan JP, Nguyen HN, Jacobs N, Paul RH.
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Apr; 33(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 3367338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [The role of vibroacoustic stimulation in antenatal fetal assessment].
    Leis Marquez MT, Hernández Andrade E, Maya Goldsmit D, Pérez de la Huerta MI, López García RB.
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1993 Dec; 61():356-9. PubMed ID: 8119607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Antepartum fetal surveillance. Nonstress test, contraction stress test, and biophysical profile.
    Babbitt NE.
    S D J Med; 1996 Nov; 49(11):403-8. PubMed ID: 8973133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. An active management approach to the postdate fetus with a reactive nonstress test and fetal heart rate decelerations.
    Small ML, Phelan JP, Smith CV, Paul RH.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Oct; 70(4):636-40. PubMed ID: 3627631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The nonstress test: how long is enough?
    Brown R, Patrick J.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Nov 15; 141(6):646-51. PubMed ID: 7315894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation.
    Zimmer EZ, Divon MY.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar 15; 81(3):451-7. PubMed ID: 8437804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test.
    Smith CV, Phelan JP, Platt LD, Broussard P, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jul 15; 155(1):131-4. PubMed ID: 3524234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cross-over trial of fetal heart rate response to halogen light and vibroacoustic stimulation.
    Bolnick JM, Garcia G, Fletcher BG, Rayburn WF.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Apr 15; 19(4):215-9. PubMed ID: 16854694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Does Doppler-detected fetal movement decrease the incidence of nonreactive nonstress tests?
    Stanco LM, Rabello Y, Medearis AL, Paul RH.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec 15; 82(6):999-1003. PubMed ID: 8233279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Vibroacoustic stimulation and fetal heart rate in nonstress tests.
    Sleutel MR.
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1990 Dec 15; 19(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 2358916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The nonstress test: the false negative test.
    Phelan JP, Cromartie AD, Smith CV.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Feb 01; 142(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 7065018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.