These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

133 related items for PubMed ID: 24614881

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of impression accuracy of tilted and straight implants in All-on-Four technique.
    Ehsani S, Siadat H, Alikhasi M.
    Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 24614881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effect of implant connection length on the dimensional impression accuracy of inclined implants.
    Ehsani S, Siadat H, Alikhasi M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013 Apr; 28(6):e315-20. PubMed ID: 24278936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K, Zandparsa R, Finkelman M, Hirayama H.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N, Alikhasi M, Samadizadeh S, Beyabanaki E, Kharazifard MJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The Effect of Implant Angulation on the Transfer Accuracy of External-Connection Implants.
    Alikhasi M, Siadat H, Rahimian S.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 17(4):822-9. PubMed ID: 24299654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M, Garg P, Prithviraj DR.
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of Different Impression Techniques When Using the All-on-Four Implant Treatment Protocol.
    Siadat H, Alikhasi M, Beyabanaki E, Rahimian S.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016 Apr; 29(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 27148987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
    Hariharan R, Shankar C, Rajan M, Baig MR, Azhagarasan NS.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Apr; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
    Saini HS, Jain S, Kumar S, Aggarwal R, Choudhary S, Reddy NK.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug 01; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The effect of impression technique and implant angulation on the impression accuracy of external- and internal-connection implants.
    Mpikos P, Kafantaris N, Tortopidis D, Galanis C, Kaisarlis G, Koidis P.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Aug 01; 27(6):1422-8. PubMed ID: 23189292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Aug 01; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants.
    Conrad HJ, Pesun IJ, DeLong R, Hodges JS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun 01; 97(6):349-56. PubMed ID: 17618917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of accuracy of complete-arch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials.
    Buzayan M, Baig MR, Yunus N.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013 Jun 01; 28(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 24278919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Accuracy of 3 different impression techniques for internal connection angulated implants.
    Tsagkalidis G, Tortopidis D, Mpikos P, Kaisarlis G, Koidis P.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct 01; 114(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 26213265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Sorrentino R, Gherlone EF, Calesini G, Zarone F.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May 01; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb 01; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH, Lim YJ, Yim SH, Kim CW.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Feb 01; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Three-dimensional accuracy of implant and abutment level impression techniques: effect on marginal discrepancy.
    Alikhasi M, Siadat H, Monzavi A, Momen-Heravi F.
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Dec 01; 37(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 20594060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of multiple use of impression copings on the accuracy of implant transfer.
    Alikhasi M, Bassir SH, Naini RB.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013 Dec 01; 28(2):408-14. PubMed ID: 23527342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.