These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

350 related items for PubMed ID: 2462222

  • 21. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers.
    Rediker DE, Eagle KA, Homma S, Gillam LD, Harthorne JW.
    Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb 01; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3341209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Rate responsive pacing using the evoked QT principle. A physiological alternative to atrial synchronous pacemakers.
    Donaldson RM, Rickards AF.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 Nov 01; 6(6):1344-9. PubMed ID: 6196745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Benefit of single setting rate responsive ventricular pacing compared with fixed rate demand pacing in elderly patients.
    Gammage M, Schofield S, Rankin I, Bennett M, Coles P, Pentecost B.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Feb 01; 14(2 Pt 1):174-80. PubMed ID: 1706502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [A clinical evaluation of the current methods for cardiac pacing electrostimulation].
    Drogaĭtsev AD, Nechaev DD, Polezhaev VV.
    Ter Arkh; 1990 Feb 01; 62(9):55-61. PubMed ID: 2281407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Comparative functional effects of chronic ventricular demand and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing.
    Yee R, Benditt DG, Kostuk WJ, Ko PT, Purves P, Klein GJ.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1984 Jan 01; 7(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 6199764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Activity-sensing rate responsive versus conventional fixed-rate pacing: a comparison of rate behavior and patient well-being during routine daily exercise.
    Candinas RA, Gloor HO, Amann FW, Schoenbeck M, Turina M.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Feb 01; 14(2 Pt 1):204-13. PubMed ID: 1706506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Clinical observations with a dual sensor rate adaptive single chamber pacemaker.
    Provenier F, van Acker R, Backers J, van Wassenhove E, de Meyer V, Jordaens L.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov 01; 15(11 Pt 2):1821-5. PubMed ID: 1279554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.