These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
165 related items for PubMed ID: 24622881
1. Fast prediction of hydration free energies for SAMPL4 blind test from a classical density functional theory. Fu J, Liu Y, Wu J. J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Mar; 28(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 24622881 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting hydration free energies with a hybrid QM/MM approach: an evaluation of implicit and explicit solvation models in SAMPL4. König G, Pickard FC, Mei Y, Brooks BR. J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Mar; 28(3):245-57. PubMed ID: 24504703 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Computation of Hydration Free Energies Using the Multiple Environment Single System Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical Method. König G, Mei Y, Pickard FC, Simmonett AC, Miller BT, Herbert JM, Woodcock HL, Brooks BR, Shao Y. J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Jan 12; 12(1):332-44. PubMed ID: 26613419 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting hydration free energies with chemical accuracy: the SAMPL4 challenge. Sandberg L. J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Mar 12; 28(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 24550133 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of free energies of hydration with COSMO-RS on the SAMPL4 data set. Reinisch J, Klamt A. J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Mar 12; 28(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 24420026 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Extended solvent-contact model approach to SAMPL4 blind prediction challenge for hydration free energies. Park H. J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Mar 12; 28(3):175-86. PubMed ID: 24554191 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Testing the semi-explicit assembly model of aqueous solvation in the SAMPL4 challenge. Li L, Dill KA, Fennell CJ. J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Mar 12; 28(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 24474161 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Blind prediction of solvation free energies from the SAMPL4 challenge. Mobley DL, Wymer KL, Lim NM, Guthrie JP. J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Mar 12; 28(3):135-50. PubMed ID: 24615156 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of charge models for fixed-charge force fields: small-molecule hydration free energies in explicit solvent. Mobley DL, Dumont E, Chodera JD, Dill KA. J Phys Chem B; 2007 Mar 08; 111(9):2242-54. PubMed ID: 17291029 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Solvation free energies of amino acid side chain analogs for common molecular mechanics water models. Shirts MR, Pande VS. J Chem Phys; 2005 Apr 01; 122(13):134508. PubMed ID: 15847482 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficient calculation of SAMPL4 hydration free energies using OMEGA, SZYBKI, QUACPAC, and Zap TK. Ellingson BA, Geballe MT, Wlodek S, Bayly CI, Skillman AG, Nicholls A. J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Mar 01; 28(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 24633516 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Extensive all-atom Monte Carlo sampling and QM/MM corrections in the SAMPL4 hydration free energy challenge. Genheden S, Cabedo Martinez AI, Criddle MP, Essex JW. J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Mar 01; 28(3):187-200. PubMed ID: 24488307 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid prediction of solvation free energy. 3. Application to the SAMPL2 challenge. Purisima EO, Corbeil CR, Sulea T. J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2010 Apr 01; 24(4):373-83. PubMed ID: 20414699 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of the IEF-MST solvation continuum model in a blind test prediction of hydration free energies. Soteras I, Forti F, Orozco M, Luque FJ. J Phys Chem B; 2009 Jul 09; 113(27):9330-4. PubMed ID: 19534454 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Protein-Ligand Electrostatic Binding Free Energies from Explicit and Implicit Solvation. Izadi S, Aguilar B, Onufriev AV. J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Sep 08; 11(9):4450-9. PubMed ID: 26575935 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of hydration free energies for the SAMPL4 data set with the AMOEBA polarizable force field. Manzoni F, Söderhjelm P. J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Mar 08; 28(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 24577872 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative Assessment of Computational Methods for Free Energy Calculations of Ionic Hydration. Zhang H, Jiang Y, Yan H, Cui Z, Yin C. J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Nov 27; 57(11):2763-2775. PubMed ID: 29039666 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of SAMPL2 aqueous solvation free energies and tautomeric ratios using the SM8, SM8AD, and SMD solvation models. Ribeiro RF, Marenich AV, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG. J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2010 Apr 27; 24(4):317-33. PubMed ID: 20358259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of the IEF-MST solvation continuum model in the SAMPL2 blind test prediction of hydration and tautomerization free energies. Soteras I, Orozco M, Luque FJ. J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2010 Apr 27; 24(4):281-91. PubMed ID: 20300801 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the accuracy of inhomogeneous fluid solvation theory in predicting hydration free energies of simple solutes. Huggins DJ, Payne MC. J Phys Chem B; 2013 Jul 11; 117(27):8232-44. PubMed ID: 23763625 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]