These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

235 related items for PubMed ID: 24628408

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The short-term treatment effects of face mask therapy in Class III patients based on the anchorage device: miniplates vs rapid maxillary expansion.
    Lee NK, Yang IH, Baek SH.
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 22264134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion.
    Cevidanes L, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA, De Clerck H.
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):799-806. PubMed ID: 20578848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction.
    Hino CT, Cevidanes LH, Nguyen TT, De Clerck HJ, Franchi L, McNamara JA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):705-14. PubMed ID: 24182587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A retrospective comparison of two protocols for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion in prepubertal children: hybrid hyrax expander with mandibular miniplates and rapid maxillary expansion with face mask.
    Tarraf NE, Dalci O, Dalci K, Altug AT, Darendeliler MA.
    Prog Orthod; 2023 Jan 23; 24(1):3. PubMed ID: 36683080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of the effects of face mask treatment started simultaneously and after the completion of the alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction procedure.
    Canturk BH, Celikoglu M.
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar 23; 85(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 25017013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Long-term results of surgically assisted maxillary protraction vs regular facemask.
    Nevzatoğlu S, Küçükkeleş N.
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov 23; 84(6):1002-9. PubMed ID: 24654941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P, Wilmes B, Drescher D, Martin C, Weaver B, Gunel E.
    Prog Orthod; 2015 Nov 23; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.
    Liu W, Zhou Y, Wang X, Liu D, Zhou S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct 23; 148(4):641-51. PubMed ID: 26432320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Dentofacial effects of two facemask therapies for maxillary protraction.
    Ge YS, Liu J, Chen L, Han JL, Guo X.
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Nov 23; 82(6):1083-91. PubMed ID: 22639823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effectiveness of reverse twin block with lip pads-RME and face mask with RME in the early treatment of class III malocclusion.
    Minase RA, Bhad WA, Doshi UH.
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Apr 08; 20(1):14. PubMed ID: 30957212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effects of facial mask/bite block therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion.
    Pavoni C, Mucedero M, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Polimeni A, Cozza P.
    Prog Orthod; 2009 Apr 08; 10(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19506743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy.
    Macdonald KE, Kapust AJ, Turley PK.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul 08; 116(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10393575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Rapid maxillary expansion compared to surgery for assistance in maxillary face mask protraction.
    Küçükkeleş N, Nevzatoğlu S, Koldaş T.
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan 08; 81(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 20936953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Short-term effects of a modified Alt-RAMEC protocol for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a controlled study.
    Masucci C, Franchi L, Giuntini V, Defraia E.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Nov 08; 17(4):259-69. PubMed ID: 25041370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of double-plate appliance/facemask combination and facemask therapy in treating class III malocclusions.
    Gencer D, Kaygisiz E, Yüksel S, Tortop T.
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar 08; 85(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 24913739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Three-dimensional alterations in pharyngeal airway and maxillary sinus volumes in Class III maxillary deficiency subjects undergoing orthopedic facemask treatment.
    Pamporakis P, Nevzatoğlu Ş, Küçükkeleş N.
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul 08; 84(4):701-7. PubMed ID: 24417494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.