These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

283 related items for PubMed ID: 24629417

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D preference-based generic instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Salaffi F, Carotti M, Ciapetti A, Gasparini S, Grassi W.
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2011; 29(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 21813061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population.
    Petrou S, Hockley C.
    Health Econ; 2005 Nov; 14(11):1169-89. PubMed ID: 15942981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparison of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores in a study of patients with schizophrenia.
    McCrone P, Patel A, Knapp M, Schene A, Koeter M, Amaddeo F, Ruggeri M, Giessler A, Puschner B, Thornicroft G.
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2009 Mar; 12(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 19346564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Responsiveness of EQ-5D and SF-6D in patients with early arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort.
    Gaujoux-Viala C, Rat AC, Guillemin F, Flipo RM, Fardellone P, Bourgeois P, Fautrel B.
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2012 Sep; 71(9):1478-83. PubMed ID: 22419775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The responsiveness of quality of life utilities to change in depression: a comparison of instruments (SF-6D, EQ-5D, and DFD).
    Gerhards SA, Huibers MJ, Theunissen KA, de Graaf LE, Widdershoven GA, Evers SM.
    Value Health; 2011 Sep; 14(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 21839412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Validity and responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in patients with health complaints attributed to their amalgam fillings: a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing amalgam removal.
    Lamu AN, Björkman L, Hamre HJ, Alræk T, Musial F, Robberstad B.
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Apr 17; 19(1):125. PubMed ID: 33865400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Interchangeability of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D, and comparison of their psychometric properties in a spinal postoperative Spanish population.
    Selva-Sevilla C, Ferrara P, Gerónimo-Pardo M.
    Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Jun 17; 21(4):649-662. PubMed ID: 32065301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Quality of Life and General Health After Elective Surgery for Cervical Spine Pathologies: Determining a Valid and Responsive Metric of Health State Utility.
    Chotai S, Parker SL, Sivaganesan A, Godil SS, McGirt MJ, Devin CJ.
    Neurosurgery; 2015 Oct 17; 77(4):553-60; discussion 560. PubMed ID: 26191977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
    Noel CW, Lee DJ, Kong Q, Xu W, Simpson C, Brown D, Gilbert RW, Gullane PJ, Irish JC, Huang SH, O'Sullivan B, Goldstein DP, de Almeida JR.
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug 17; 141(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 26204439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.