These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

2154 related items for PubMed ID: 24631232

  • 1. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, Yadav H.
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S, Azarsina M, Majidi S.
    Oper Dent; 2011 May; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE, Farrag NM.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010 May; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Microtensile bond strengths and interfacial examination of a polyalkenoate-based 1-step adhesive.
    Perdigão J, Sezinando A, Gomes G.
    Am J Dent; 2011 Aug; 24(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 22016915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF.
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.
    Güngör HC, Canoğlu E, Cehreli ZC.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014 Feb; 38(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 25095316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M, Karvandi TM, Kamali B, Mazaheri H.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012 Feb; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations.
    Aggarwal V, Logani A, Jain V, Shah N.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Feb; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S, Inokoshi S, Ozer F, Pereira PN, Ogata M, Tagami J.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Feb; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Shear bond strength of three different nano-restorative materials to dentin.
    Korkmaz Y, Gurgan S, Firat E, Nathanson D.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Feb; 35(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 20166411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S, de Freitas CR, Saad JR, Sadan A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Marginal adaptation of indirect restorations using different resin coating protocols.
    Medina AD, de Paula AB, de Fucio SB, Puppin-Rontani RM, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA.
    Braz Dent J; 2012 Jul; 23(6):672-8. PubMed ID: 23338259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Baracco B, Perdigão J, Cabrera E, Giráldez I, Ceballos L.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Jul; 37(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 22313275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O, Uçtaşh M, Alaçam A, Omürlü H.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jul; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jul; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM, Kakaboura AI, Ardu S, Krejci I.
    Oper Dent; 2007 Jul; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T, Lösche AC, Lösche GM, Roulet JF.
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
    Guéders AM, Charpentier JF, Albert AI, Geerts SO.
    Oper Dent; 2006 Feb; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Concurrent evaluation of composite internal adaptation and bond strength in a class-I cavity.
    Bakhsh TA, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Mandurah MM, Hariri I, Alsayed EZ, Tagami J, Sumi Y.
    J Dent; 2013 Jan; 41(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 23044389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength.
    Pongprueksa P, Kuphasuk W, Senawongse P.
    Oper Dent; 2007 Jan; 32(5):466-75. PubMed ID: 17910223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 108.