These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1369 related items for PubMed ID: 24640441

  • 41. Three-and-a-half-year clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin in children.
    Memarpour M, Mesbahi M, Shafıei F.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2010; 77(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 20819404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Randomized controlled clinical trial of the 24-months survival of composite resin restorations after one-step incomplete and complete excavation on primary teeth.
    Franzon R, Opdam NJ, Guimarães LF, Demarco FF, Casagrande L, Haas AN, Araujo FB.
    J Dent; 2015 Oct; 43(10):1235-41. PubMed ID: 26231301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin composites in Class I restorations: three-year results of a randomized, double-blind and controlled clinical trial.
    Shi L, Wang X, Zhao Q, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Ren Y, Chen Z.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Oct; 35(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20166406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Silver amalgam versus resin modified GIC class-II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical evaluation.
    Dutta BN, Gauba K, Tewari A, Chawla HS.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Sep; 19(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 11817797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
    Eden E, Topaloglu-Ak A, Frencken JE, van't Hof M.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial.
    Hesse D, Bonifácio CC, Mendes FM, Braga MM, Imparato JC, Raggio DP.
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 May 28; 14():58. PubMed ID: 24884684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. One-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without additional enamel etching technique in cervical lesions.
    Ozel E, Say EC, Yurdaguven H, Soyman M.
    Aust Dent J; 2010 Jun 28; 55(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 20604757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Clinical evaluation of nanofill and nanohybrid composite in Class I restorations: a 12-month randomized trial.
    Andrade AK, Duarte RM, Silva FD, Batista AU, Lima KC, Pontual ML, Montes MA.
    Gen Dent; 2012 Jun 28; 60(4):e255-62. PubMed ID: 22782061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. 30-Month randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a nanofill and a nanohybrid composite.
    de Andrade AK, Duarte RM, Medeiros e Silva FD, Batista AU, Lima KC, Pontual ML, Montes MA.
    J Dent; 2011 Jan 28; 39(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20888884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Clinical comparison of bur- and laser-prepared minimally invasive occlusal resin composite restorations: two-year follow-up.
    Yazici AR, Baseren M, Gorucu J.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Jan 28; 35(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 20945740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Clinical evaluation of three caries removal approaches in primary teeth: a randomised controlled trial.
    Phonghanyudh A, Phantumvanit P, Songpaisan Y, Petersen PE.
    Community Dent Health; 2012 Jun 28; 29(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 22779380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. A 7-year randomized prospective study of a one-step self-etching adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. The effect of curing modes and restorative material.
    van Dijken JW, Pallesen U.
    J Dent; 2012 Dec 28; 40(12):1060-7. PubMed ID: 22955004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Koubi S, Raskin A, Bukiet F, Pignoly C, Toca E, Tassery H.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov 01; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R, Boushell LW, Heymann HO, Ritter AV, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Chung Y, Swift EJ.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014 Nov 01; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
    Brackett MG, Dib A, Brackett WW, Estrada BE, Reyes AA.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Nov 01; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Influence of restorative techniques on marginal adaptation and dye penetration around Class V restorations.
    Pereira Ade F, Poiate IA, Poiate E, Rodrigues FP, Turbino ML, Miranda WG.
    Gen Dent; 2012 Nov 01; 60(1):e17-21. PubMed ID: 22313988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Clinical performance of aesthetic restorative materials in primary teeth according to the FDI criteria.
    Bektas Donmez S, Uysal S, Dolgun A, Turgut MD.
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep 01; 17(3):202-212. PubMed ID: 27759409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. A retrospective clinical study of cervical restorations: longevity and failure-prognostic variables.
    Namgung C, Rho YJ, Jin BH, Lim BS, Cho BH.
    Oper Dent; 2013 Sep 01; 38(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 23215544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
    Baratieri LN, Ritter AV.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001 Sep 01; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Lack of effect of fluoride releasing resin modified glass ionomer restorations on the contacting surface of adjacent primary molars. a clinical prospective study.
    Kotsanos N, Dionysopoulos P.
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Sep 01; 5(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 15471520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 69.